Moving Reference Frames and elastic collision

AI Thread Summary
In a head-on elastic collision involving two bodies with masses m and M, where m is significantly smaller than M, the final velocities can be predicted using reference frames. When M approaches with speed v0 and m is initially at rest, transforming to a frame where M is stationary reveals that m has an initial velocity of -v0. After the collision, m bounces back with the same speed, resulting in a final velocity of v0 in the original frame. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using appropriate reference frames to analyze the collision dynamics accurately. Understanding the relationship between initial and final velocities in different frames is crucial for solving elastic collision problems.
fudawala
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a head-on, elastic collision between two bodies whose masses are m and M, with m << M. It is well known that if m has speed v0 and M is initially at rest, m will bounce straight back with its speed unchanged, while M will remain at rest (to an excellent approximation). Use this fact to predict the final velocities if M approaches with speed v0 and m is initially at rest.

Homework Equations


u = u' + v (the classical velocity addition formula)
Newton's Second Law: F = ma & F' = m'*a' (The two laws for the two fixed reference frames S and S')

The Attempt at a Solution


Basically, the way I would solve this problem is think that m and M are both masses. Since u = u' + v and u' = u - v, using Newton's First Law, small m is isolated from all outside forces so then the velocity u is constant relative to the lab. Then the velocity of M is going to be v0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But what's the final velocity of the small mass?

Hint: View things from a frame in which M is at rest, then you can apply the given fact. Once you solve the collision in that frame, transform your answer back to the original frame.
 
Moving Reference Frame

I don't understand the Hint that you gave me. Can you give an example.
 
The principle of (galilean) relativity says that we can view things from any inertial frame we want. So pick a frame in which we know the answer. In the original frame of reference, m is at rest while M moves with velocity v0. Instead, view things from a frame in which M is at rest. In that frame, what is the initial velocity of m? The final velocity of m?
 
I think the initial velocity of m is going to be v0 when M is the fixed reference frame. The final velocity will be unchanged when m is bounced straight back without changing the velocity so I would think that the final velocity is constant.
 
Last edited:
fudawala said:
I think the initial velocity of m is going to be v0 when M is the fixed reference frame.
OK. Let's say that initially m was at rest (in the original frame) and M was moving at speed v0 to the right. Transforming to a moving frame in which M is at rest (just add -v0 to all velocities) gives m a velocity of -v0. In other words: m moves to the left with speed v0.
The final velocity will be zero because m came to a hault and stopped when still M is at rest.
m does not come to a halt after colliding elastically with M: it bounces straight back with the same speed.

Remember, you are told this:

fudawala said:
It is well known that if m has speed v0 and M is initially at rest, m will bounce straight back with its speed unchanged, while M will remain at rest (to an excellent approximation).
You are expected to use that fact.
 
fudawala said:
I think the initial velocity of m is going to be v0 when M is the fixed reference frame. The final velocity will be unchanged when m is bounced straight back without changing the velocity so I would think that the final velocity is constant.
The speed is unchanged (in the moving frame), but the velocity is not constant. Using what I said in the last post, what are the initial and final velocities of m in the moving frame?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
701
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top