Multicellularity: How Do They Determine It Evolved 20+ Times?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Patzee
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the evolutionary leap to multicellularity as reported in a New Scientist article, highlighting that multicellularity has evolved at least 20 times since the origin of life, with the last occurrence around 200 million years ago. The conversation explores how scientists determine these evolutionary events, emphasizing that fossil records are insufficient for this purpose. Instead, researchers analyze the biochemistry of living organisms, particularly focusing on cellular communication mechanisms. By comparing the signaling substances used by different multicellular organisms, scientists can infer common ancestry; if the signaling differs, it suggests a lack of a shared multicellular ancestor. This biochemical approach, among others, aids in understanding the relationships between multicellular life forms.
Patzee
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
In a New Scientist article (also posted on many other sites):

"Lab yeast make evolutionary leap to multicellularity" (http://www.newscientist.com/article...ke-evolutionary-leap-to-multicellularity.html)...

there is the statement: "Multicellularity has evolved at least 20 times since life began, but the last time was about 200 million years ago, leaving few clues to the precise sequence of events."

How do they determine this? For example, by discovery of life forms that no longer exist in the fossil record or by some other method?

Thanks! Pat
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Others will for sure give better answers, but no, it is not about fossils. Fossils don't carry enough information.

However, for example, you can compare biochemistry of two living organisms and the way cells exchange signals (they do, as they have to communicate for an organism to survive). All descendants of a first multicellular organism will share the communication engine biochemistry, if signals are different (that is, substances used to send signals are different), there is no common multicellular ancestor.

I am not sure that's exactly the way it was done, there are probably many different methods that will allow determination of whether two multicellular organisms are related, but this one should work at least in some cases.
 
Borek, thanks! That's very helpful!
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
I use ethanol for cleaning glassware and resin 3D prints. The glassware is sometimes used for food. If possible, I'd prefer to only keep one grade of ethanol on hand. I've made sugar mash, but that is hardly the least expensive feedstock for ethanol. I had given some thought to using wheat flour, and for this I would need a source for amylase enzyme (relevant data, but not the core question). I am now considering animal feed that I have access to for 20 cents per pound. This is a...
Back
Top