Multiple dielectrics in one capacitor

AI Thread Summary
To determine the largest capacitance for a parallel plate capacitor using multiple dielectrics, one must consider the individual capacitances of each dielectric material and their arrangement. The capacitance for each dielectric can be calculated using the formula C = (κ)(ε)(Area)/(Distance), where κ is the dielectric constant. When dielectrics are stacked, they function as separate capacitors in series, leading to the equation 1/C = 1/C1 + 1/C2 + ... + 1/Cn for total capacitance. The effective capacitance for multiple dielectrics is not simply the product of their dielectric constants; rather, it requires careful consideration of their arrangement and thickness. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
Rake-MC
Messages
324
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I'm absolutely, completely and utterly stumped with this one question I've been given..

Here is the exact question:

Given that you possesses the following materials:
(i) two sheets of copper of uniform thickness;
(ii) one sheet of mica of uniform thickness 0.10 mm and dielectric constant κ= 6;
(iii) one sheet of glass of uniform thickness 2.0 mm and dielectric constant κ = 7;
(iv) one sheet of paraffin wax of uniform thickness 1.0 cm and dielectric constant
κ = 2;
determine which sheet, or combination of sheets, will produce a parallel plate capacitor of
the largest capacitance when placed between the copper sheets. Assume that all sheets
have the same shape.

Relevant equations that I have are:
C=(kappa)(epsilon)(Area)/(Distance)
V=V[initial]/kappa
but there are probably plenty more. I have equations for potential energy and such, but I'm not sure if they are necessary for the question.

attempt at a solution

Well as I said, I am completely stumped. I can calculate the capacitance of each dielectric on its own in the capacitor, but the combination ones are the ones I'm stuck with. This is what I've got so far {probably way off track}.

C[mica] = 6(epsilon)(area)/0.1x10^-3
C[glass] = 7(epsilon)(area)/2x10^-3
C[wax] = 2(epsilon)(area)/0.01

Can I ignore epsilon and area because they are common in all the equations?

for the dielectrics next to each other;

C[effective] = C[no dielectric]*k[1]*k[2]

This is most likely wrong. I know that for one dielectric, you can simply say that C[effective] = C[no dielectric]*k
where k = kappa

But I simply don't know how to derive a formula for multiple dielectrics.

Also, I do have knowledge of the theory of how dielectrics work, ie. how they generate opposing electric fields to that of the capacitor, but I am still 100% stuck with this question..Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have multiple sheets of dielectric stacked on each other, you can imagine that each sheet is a distinct capacitor and these capacitors are connected in series. The total capacitance C is then

\frac{1}{C} = \frac{1}{C_1} + \frac{1}{C_2} + \cdots + \frac{1}{C_n}
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top