Multiple electric generators on the same drive shaft

  • Thread starter Thread starter Questioneverything
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Using multiple generators on a common drive shaft offers both advantages and disadvantages. A single generator is generally easier to control due to having one control circuit, while multiple generators provide redundancy in case of failure. The effectiveness of either setup depends on the source and variation of shaft power. Controlling individual generators can better match torque variations, but synchronizing multiple units can complicate operations. Ultimately, the choice between a single generator and multiple units hinges on specific operational needs and reliability considerations.
Questioneverything
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
What are the pros and cons of having multiple generators on a common drive shaft?
As the torque on the drive shaft varies, is it more effective / efficient to switch on and control individual generators to match the shaft torque or to have a large single generator and vary the load to match the shaft torque ?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.
That will depend on the source and variation of shaft power.
One single unit is easier to control, with one control circuit.
Three separate generators would give redundancy in the case of a failure.
 
There are exceptions, but usually to control a single generator is simpler than to sync between independent control circuits.
 
Hi, Thanks for your reply and comments.
 
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Back
Top