Multiple Integrals for Functions Unbounded at Isolated Points

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around defining multiple integrals for functions that are unbounded at isolated points, particularly in the context of a homework assignment. Participants explore how to handle discontinuities in the region of integration and propose methods for generalizing the definition of the integral when multiple undefined points are present.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related, Exploratory, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests removing a sphere around a discontinuity to define the integral and questions how to generalize this for multiple undefined points.
  • Another participant indicates that the same approach can be applied to each discontinuity individually, but notes that a more sophisticated method may be needed for an infinite number of points.
  • A further contribution raises a question about how to structure the bounds of the integral when multiple discontinuities are involved, proposing a sequence of intervals with limits approaching zero.
  • One participant critiques the notation used, stating that it is confusing and emphasizes the need to treat each discontinuity separately.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to defining the integral with multiple undefined points, and there are varying opinions on how to structure the bounds and notation.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the definitions and notation used, and the discussion does not resolve how to handle cases with an infinite number of discontinuities.

silvershadow7
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In a recent homework assignment, I was asked to prodive a definition for ∫f(x) in the Region D, provided there was a discontinuity somewhere in the region. To define the integral, we merely removed a sphere centered on the discontinuity of radius δ>0 and found the limit of the integral as δ→0.

My question is how would you provide a more generalized definition for a function that had multiple undefined points? if i had points (x1,y1) and (x2,y2) where the function was undefined.

Would I somehow split the integral up into three parts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whatever trick you used can be used separately at each point in question. You would need a more sophisticated approach if there are an infinite number of points involved.
 
but if the integral originally broke up the bounds to be one integral with (a, δ) and the second integal with(δ,b), with δ going to zero after the integral was evaluated, then how would the bounds look with more points??

(a,δ1) , (δ1,δ2), (δ2,δ3), ...etc (δn, b) ??

with each of those δ, going to zero??
 
Your notation is very confusing. The general idea is to treat each discontinuity separately.

You use a, b, various δ's, without defining anything.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K