Multiple Slit Interference and Driffraction Grating

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the angular positions of maxima and minima in a five-slit interference system. The correct formulas for maxima and minima are provided, and initial calculations for the first two maxima yield correct results. However, there is confusion regarding the calculations for the 3rd and 6th minima, with initial attempts resulting in incorrect answers. Clarification suggests that the minima should be calculated using the correct fractions of the wavelength, leading to revised angles of approximately 2.50° for the 3rd minima and 5.84° for the 6th minima. The problem emphasizes the importance of accurately interpreting the slit system and the required output format in degrees.
Godcanthelp
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A five-slit system with 8.4*10-6 slit spacing is illuminated with 610*10-9 light.

Find the angular position of the first two maxima, and the 3rd and 6th minima.

Homework Equations


For Maxima:
d*sin(θ) = m*λ
θ = sin-1((m*λ)/d)

For Minima:
d*sin(θ) = (m/N)λ
θ = sin-1((m/(N*d))λ)

The Attempt at a Solution


λ = 610*10-1
d = 8.4*10-6
N = 5

Subbing my values into find the first and second maxima I solve for θ = 4.16, 8.35 respectively. These answers are correct according to my online module.

However, I cannot find the 3rd and 6th minima.
My attempt:

for m = 3
θ = sin-1((m/N*d)λ)
θ = sin-1((3/(5*8.4*10-6))610*10-9)
θ = 2.49°

for m = 6
θ = sin-1((6/(5*8.4*10-6))610*10-9)
θ = 4.99°

These answers are given as incorrect using the online module.I read further into the problem and discovered that a system with N = 5 slits should have N-1 = 4 minima between each maxima. From the equation we can see that the 3rd minima will occur at 3/5 of one wavelength. Maybe I should try a trigonometric approach?
I am really stuck and any input is greatly appreciated.

Regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess it depends on how you interpret:
Godcanthelp said:
Find the angular position of the first two maxima, and the 3rd and 6th minima.
I'd argue that the first two maxima are at θ = asin(0*λ/d),asin(1*λ/d) and the 3rd and 6th minima are at θ = asin(3/5*λ/d) and θ = asin(7/5*λ/d), respectively.

Edit:
To illustrate:
asin(0/5*λ/d) → maxima
asin(1/5*λ/d) → minima
asin(2/5*λ/d) → minima
asin(3/5*λ/d) → minima
asin(4/5*λ/d) → minima
asin(5/5*λ/d) → maxima
asin(6/5*λ/d) → minima
asin(7/5*λ/d) → minima

etc.

Second edit:
I think arcsin, but I write asin. MATLAB habit.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, I was using 6/5 instead of 7/5

This still leaves me with the values 2.49, and 5.84 as the values for the 3rd and 6th minima.

The online module gives three attempts, and I've already used 2 (my friend told me to treat it as a double slit system, not surprisingly it was incorrect). Is there any other errors I could have made before I try this solution?
 
Godcanthelp said:
Is there any other errors I could have made before I try this solution?
If whoever wrote the problem statement agrees with my interpretation, then I can't see any problem with your solution for the 3rd (round to nearest integer perhaps, 2.50) and 6th minima. You're sure the result is supposed to be given in degrees?
 
milesyoung said:
If whoever wrote the problem statement agrees with my interpretation, then I can't see any problem with your solution for the 3rd (round to nearest integer perhaps, 2.50) and 6th minima. You're sure the result is supposed to be given in degrees?

Yeah the answer is required in degrees, appreciate the help. Thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top