I Multiplication by a matrix in GL rotates a plane's basis?

joej24
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
Let A = (a_{ij}) be a k\times n matrix of rank k.
The k row vectors, a_i are linearly independent and span a k-dimensional plane in \mathbb{R}^n.

In "Geometry, Topology, and Physics" (Ex 5.5 about the Grassmann manifold), the author states that for a matrix g\in \textrm{GL}(k,\mathbb{R}),
\overline{A} = gA defines the same plane as A because g simply rotates the basis within the k-plane.

I'm having trouble seeing this.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Let ##r_j## denote the ##j##th row of ##A##, and consider a vector ##v## that is normal to the ##k##-dimensional plane. Note that ##v## must be perpendicular to all ##r_j##, so ##r_j\cdot n=0##.

Then ##Av=0## since the ##j##th component of ##An## is ##r_j\cdot v##.

So ##\bar Av=(gA)v=g(Av)=g\mathbf 0=\mathbf0##. So ##v## is also normal to the plane defined by ##\bar A##. Since that holds for all ##(n-k)## basis vectors of the null space of ##A##, and the rank of ##\bar A## is the same as that of ##A##, the plane (its rowspace) must be the same.
 
Thank you, I understand now. When you say
andrewkirk said:
Since that holds for all ##(n-k)## basis vectors of the null space of ##A##
this means that all the ## v ## perpendicular to the ## k##-dimensional plane satisfy ## \overline{A} v = 0##.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top