Multiplication in a LaPlace Transform

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the Laplace transform of the function f(t) = e^(at)sin(bt), where a and b are real constants. The original poster shares their attempt at a solution and expresses uncertainty about the correct approach due to the presence of two distinct functions within the expression.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the Laplace transform to the function, with the original poster attempting to multiply the transforms of the individual components. Questions arise regarding the validity of this approach and whether other methods, such as using the shifting theorem or expressing sine in terms of exponentials, might be more appropriate.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants offering guidance on alternative methods to tackle the problem. Suggestions include using the hint provided to express sine in exponential form and applying the definition of the Laplace transform directly to the function.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the shifting theorem, which the original poster may not have encountered yet, indicating a potential gap in foundational knowledge that could affect their understanding of the problem.

TG3
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Find the Laplace transform of the given function, a and b are real constants.
Hint: cos(bt)=(e^ibt+e^-ibt)/2 and sin(bt)=(e^it-e^ibt)/2i.

f(t)=e^(at)*sin(bt)

The attempt at a solution

The LaPlace transform of e^at is 1/(s-a).

The LaPlace transform of sin(bt) is b/(s^2+b^2).

Simply multiply those together, I got b/s^3-as^2+bs^2-ab^2.

This is wrong, and it feel like I'm making a very basic mistake that should be obvious, doing something other than multiplying the two separate LaPlace transforms together. So, what am I supposed to do when the function I am supposed to work with has two easily distinguishable functions within it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you had the shifting theorems? Like for L(eatf(t)) in terms of L(f(t))?
 
I don't think so, but I'm not positive... I have trouble focusing for the entire period.
 
Well, if you haven't had the shifting theorem, you can always use the given hint. Express the sine in terms of exponentials, take the transform, and simplify it.
 
Start by plugging that function into the definition of the Laplace transform and combining the exponentials. You might be able to see the answer immediately.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K