Multiplicative Modulus Function Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter lolgarithms
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modulus
AI Thread Summary
The multiplicative modulus function is introduced as an analogue to absolute value for multiplication, defined for positive real numbers. It satisfies specific properties, including MM(1) = 1 and MM(x) = x for x ≥ 1. The function is expressed as f(x) = x if x ≥ 1 and f(x) = 1/x otherwise. The discussion raises questions about its lack of widespread use in mathematics, suggesting it may be unnecessary since it can be represented by e^{|\ln{x}|}. Ultimately, the function's limited application appears to stem from a lack of demand in mathematical contexts.
lolgarithms
Messages
120
Reaction score
0
"multiplicative modulus"

I have found a multiplicative modulus function, an analogue of absolute value for multiplication. Not a groundbreaking one, I'm sure someone has thought about this before. More specifically it is a function that satisfies:

\operatorname{MM}(1) = 1
\operatorname{MM}(x^{-1}) = \operatorname{MM}(x)
| \log{x} | = \log{(\operatorname{MM}(x))} \, \forall x \in \mathbb{R}^+
\operatorname{MM}(x) = x \, \forall x \ge 1
\operatorname{MM}^{-1} (x) = x^{\pm 1}

Why isn't this function widely used in mathematics? is it because it can be replaced with e^{|\ln{x}|} ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


May I simplify?

We define a function on the strictly positive real numbers:f(x)=x if x >=1,
f(x)=1/x otherwise.

It probably isn't widely used because no one has needed to use it.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

3
Replies
100
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K
2
Replies
64
Views
15K
2
Replies
93
Views
15K
Replies
46
Views
8K
2
Replies
98
Views
14K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top