Multiply a trigonometry function

Pin Head
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I have a question I have learn a bit about trigonometry and I came across this formula

angle = 38
length = 120
formula

length * sin( angle )

now I have look around for the understanding about this formula and tested the formula my self


0.29636857870938531739229664984902

120 * sin( 38 )

0.29636857870938531739229664984902

sin( 38 )

And as you can see they both calculate the same number, Why is this and what would be the point in using this formula.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Pin Head said:
Hi,
I have a question I have learn a bit about trigonometry and I came across this formula

angle = 38
length = 120
formula

length * sin( angle )

now I have look around for the understanding about this formula and tested the formula my self


0.29636857870938531739229664984902

120 * sin( 38 )

0.29636857870938531739229664984902

sin( 38 )

And as you can see they both calculate the same number, Why is this and what would be the point in using this formula.

Hey Pin Head and welcome to the forums.

Your figures are not correct. Using a calculator I get the following:

sin(38) = 0.2963686
120 * sin(38) = 35.56423

In terms of what this means, it is a projection of some vector with length given by length projected on to the x-axis. If you replace sin with cos you get the projection onto the y-axis.
 
Hi,
You are correct I don't no why my calculator is giving me
0.29636857870938531739229664984902
but when I tested the same equation in java programming,java gives me the answer you gave

sin(38) = 0.2963686
120 * sin(38) = 35.56423

So what would this formula be good for?
 
Pin Head said:
Hi,
You are correct I don't no why my calculator is giving me
0.29636857870938531739229664984902
but when I tested the same equation in java programming,java gives me the answer you gave

sin(38) = 0.2963686
120 * sin(38) = 35.56423

So what would this formula be good for?

Like I said above, it's useful for taking a vector and finding the x and y components of the vector.

Vectors are used in many things including physics. For example we can represent a vector to represent a force like gravity, or even a force on something like an electron.

Lets say we have a vector (a,b) which is a two-dimension vector. We calculate our length to be length = SQRT(a^2 + b^2) where SQRT is the square root function. We also calculate our angle to be angle = tan(b/a).

Now given an angle and a length we can find our x and y components. We do this by using the relationship x = length x sin(angle) and y = length x cos(angle).

This is just one reason and there are many others. But if you think about how all the scientists, engineers, and others work with systems that have vectors, then you will start to see how this is useful.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top