Multivariable calculus mass density question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the total mass of a wire shaped as part of a circle with a given mass density function. The wire is defined to traverse from the point (0,-3) to (3,0) along a circular path of radius 3, and the mass density is expressed as a function of the coordinates x and y.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss converting the problem into polar coordinates and the implications of treating the wire as either a one-dimensional or two-dimensional object. There is consideration of the appropriate integral to use for calculating mass based on the density function provided.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the correct approach to integrate the mass density function. Some participants suggest that the wire should be treated as one-dimensional, while others question the initial setup and bounds of integration. Various interpretations of the problem are being examined, and participants are providing insights into the reasoning behind their approaches.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the dimensionality of the wire and the implications for the integration method. There are also discussions about the bounds of integration and whether the initial assumptions about the path of the wire are accurate.

jamesdocherty
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let the path C traverse part of the circle or radius 3 at the origin, in a clockwise direction, from (0,-3) to (3,0). Calculate the total mass of a wire in shape C, if the mass density of the wire is u=x^2+4y

Homework Equations


mass of plate equation= double integral u(x,y) dx dy

The Attempt at a Solution


I converted the wire into polar coordinates as its a circle, with x=3cos(theta) and y=3sin(theta) and as it travels from -pi/2 to 2pi, 0<r<3 and -pi/2<theta<2pi, after doing that i subbed x=3cos(theta) and y=3sin(theta) into the mass density equation (u) to obtain u=9cos^2(theta) + 12sin(theta) and as the mass of plate equation is double integral u(x,y) dx dy I subbed the vaules into this equation but with respect to polar coordinates to get:

double integral 9cos^2(theta) + 12sin(theta) dtheta dr with 0<r<3 and -pi/2<theta<2pi

solving this ended up getting 135*pi/4 -36 to be the answer, but I'm a little confused as i think i worked out the mass for 3/4 of the circle, instead of the wire and am now thinking i might need to work out a ratio for area of circumference/total area of circle and multiply by this ratio to get the right answer.

Any Help would be much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jamesdocherty said:

Homework Statement


Let the path C traverse part of the circle or radius 3 at the origin, in a clockwise direction, from (0,-3) to (3,0). Calculate the total mass of a wire in shape C, if the mass density of the wire is u=x^2+4y

Homework Equations


mass of plate equation= double integral u(x,y) dx dy

The Attempt at a Solution


I converted the wire into polar coordinates as its a circle, with x=3cos(theta) and y=3sin(theta) and as it travels from -pi/2 to 2pi, 0<r<3 and -pi/2<theta<2pi, after doing that i subbed x=3cos(theta) and y=3sin(theta) into the mass density equation (u) to obtain u=9cos^2(theta) + 12sin(theta) and as the mass of plate equation is double integral u(x,y) dx dy I subbed the vaules into this equation but with respect to polar coordinates to get:

double integral 9cos^2(theta) + 12sin(theta) dtheta dr with 0<r<3 and -pi/2<theta<2pi

solving this ended up getting 135*pi/4 -36 to be the answer, but I'm a little confused as i think i worked out the mass for 3/4 of the circle, instead of the wire and am now thinking i might need to work out a ratio for area of circumference/total area of circle and multiply by this ratio to get the right answer.

Any Help would be much appreciated!

Why are you doing a dxdy integral? Isn't a wire a one-dimensional object?
 
i'm not sure to be honest i thought it would be a two-dimensional object as it would have both a x and y direction but i am probably wrong, if it is a one dimensional object, how would i go about solving this problem?, would it just be x=3cost and y=3sint where -pi/2<t<2pi and hence you would get the integral: 9cos^2(theta) + 12sin(theta) dt where -pi/2<t<2pi and solving this would get you 45pi/4 -12, thanks for the fast reply :)
 
Ray Vickson said:
Why are you doing a dxdy integral? Isn't a wire a one-dimensional object?
I haven't done any work on the problem, but the density is given as a function of x and y, and the wire follows a curved path (a quarter circle), so an iterated integral seems reasonable to me.
 
jamesdocherty said:
i'm not sure to be honest i thought it would be a two-dimensional object as it would have both a x and y direction but i am probably wrong, if it is a one dimensional object, how would i go about solving this problem?, would it just be x=3cost and y=3sint where -pi/2<t<2pi and hence you would get the integral: 9cos^2(theta) + 12sin(theta) dt where -pi/2<t<2pi and solving this would get you 45pi/4 -12, thanks for the fast reply :)

My interpretation is that the wire is "infinitely thin", so is just a curved line in 2 dimensions. For that reason you need two coordinates ##(x,y)## to specify a point on the wire. The "density" ##\rho(x,y)## would then be the mass per unit length at the point ##(x,y)##; that is, the mass ##\Delta m## of a little bit of wire of length ##\Delta s## located at ##(x,y)## would be ##\Delta m = \rho(x,y) \Delta s##. But that is just my interpretation.
 
Ray Vickson said:
My interpretation is that the wire is "infinitely thin", so is just a curved line in 2 dimensions. For that reason you need two coordinates ##(x,y)## to specify a point on the wire. The "density" ##\rho(x,y)## would then be the mass per unit length at the point ##(x,y)##; that is, the mass ##\Delta m## of a little bit of wire of length ##\Delta s## located at ##(x,y)## would be ##\Delta m = \rho(x,y) \Delta s##. But that is just my interpretation.

That would also be my interpretation. Otherwise I would have expected the problem to ask for the mass of a "plate" and for the boundary of the plate to be a closed curve.
 
yeah that makes sense, thanks for that, because of that i would only need to integrate once then and hence got x=3cost and y=3sint where -pi/2<t<2pi and then the integral: 9cos^2(theta) + 12sin(theta) dt where -pi/2<t<2pi and solving this would get you 45pi/4 -12, would this be correct or would i need to do something else?
 
And, just in case anyone is still confused about 1 dimensional or 2 dimensional object, remember that even though the wire exists in 3 dimensions, it only takes one parameter to locate a point on it. That's why you use ##\vec r(t)=\langle x(t),y(t),z(t)\rangle## to describe it. Same for a surface. It exists in 3 dimensional space but you only need two parameters to describe it, so you use ##\vec r(u,v)##.
 
jamesdocherty said:
yeah that makes sense, thanks for that, because of that i would only need to integrate once then and hence got x=3cost and y=3sint where -pi/2<t<2pi and then the integral: 9cos^2(theta) + 12sin(theta) dt where -pi/2<t<2pi and solving this would get you 45pi/4 -12, would this be correct or would i need to do something else?

It looks wrong. You should show your work in detail, because I cannot figure out how you got your answer.
 
  • #10
jamesdocherty said:
would it just be x=3cost and y=3sint where -pi/2<t<2pi and hence you would get the integral: 9cos^2(theta) + 12sin(theta) dt where -pi/2<t<2pi and solving this would get you 45pi/4 -12, thanks for the fast reply :)

It looks like that would be the right integral, but the bounds for theta might be incorrect. From your initial problem, you wrote "Clockwise," which would indicate a negative change in theta, from 3*pi/2 to 0.
 
  • #11
The integral is not quite correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K