MWI and EPR type experiment

In summary, the scenario of Bob and Alice's entanglement experiment raises intriguing questions about quantum entanglement and the Many-Worlds Interpretation.
  • #1
nrqed
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
3,766
297
Hopefully, this caught the attention of VanEsch.. :biggrin:


Let's say Bob and Alice do an EPR type of experiment. A gazillion entangled pair of photons is sent to Bob and Alice who are 1000 light years apart. They measure the spin of the photons. They do not know yet that this violates Bell's inequalities because they haven't comapred notes yet. Fine.

Now Bob writes down his gazillion results on a piece of paper. he places that in a vault. Then he e-mails to Joe (who is stationed in Andromeda's galaxy) the results. And he Faxes the results to Tonya, who is on the other side of the Milky way (by the time these guys receive the results, Bob and Alice will be connected causally).

Then he goes to visit Alice and compares notes.

In the MWI interpertration, what happens? What happens when Bob and Alice compares notes (to them as well as the results in the vault, in Tonya and Joe's mind. etc). Does something special happens when Bob and Alice have waited long enough to be connected causally (even before they meet in person) or only when they meet and compare notes?

Just curious...


Pat
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
ricia, as a scientist, I can say that this scenario is definitely intriguing and raises some interesting questions about quantum entanglement and the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI). In the MWI, it is believed that all possible outcomes of a measurement exist in different parallel universes, and that entangled particles are actually connected through these different universes.

In this scenario, it is likely that when Bob and Alice compare notes, they will find that their measurements violate Bell's inequalities. This would confirm that their entangled photons were indeed connected and that information was transmitted faster than the speed of light.

As for the gazillion other results in the vault, in Tonya and Joe's minds, and in other parallel universes, it is possible that the same outcome occurs in all of them. However, there could also be variations in the results depending on the specific universe and the actions of Bob and Alice in that universe.

It is also worth considering the role of causality in this situation. In the MWI, causality is not as strict as it is in classical physics. This means that even before Bob and Alice meet and compare notes, the results of their measurements could already be influencing each other in the different parallel universes.

Overall, this scenario raises some fascinating questions about the nature of entanglement and the MWI. It would be interesting to see how this experiment would play out in different interpretations of quantum mechanics.
 

1. What is the MWI interpretation and how does it relate to EPR type experiments?

The MWI (Many-Worlds Interpretation) is a theory in quantum mechanics that proposes the existence of multiple parallel universes. It suggests that every time a quantum measurement is made, the universe splits into multiple branches, with each possible outcome of the measurement occurring in a different universe. EPR (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen) type experiments are thought experiments that aim to demonstrate the counterintuitive behavior of quantum particles and are often used to support the MWI theory.

2. How does the MWI interpretation explain the phenomenon of quantum entanglement?

In the MWI, entangled particles are essentially considered to be in a superposition of states, existing in multiple universes simultaneously. When one particle is measured and its state is determined, the other particle's state is also determined in a corresponding universe, even if the two particles are separated by a great distance.

3. Can EPR type experiments provide evidence for the MWI interpretation?

While EPR type experiments are often used as evidence for the MWI, it is important to note that they are thought experiments and have not yet been conducted in real life. Thus, they cannot provide direct evidence for the MWI, but rather serve as a way to illustrate and test the theory.

4. What are some criticisms of the MWI interpretation?

One major criticism of the MWI is that it is not testable, as it relies on the existence of parallel universes that cannot be observed or proven. Additionally, some argue that the theory is too complex and adds unnecessary elements to explain quantum mechanics.

5. Are there any real-world implications of the MWI interpretation?

The MWI interpretation is largely considered to be a philosophical interpretation of quantum mechanics, rather than a practical one. While it may have implications for our understanding of the universe, it does not have any immediate real-world applications or consequences.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
62
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
55
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
3
Replies
79
Views
5K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
7K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
54
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top