My teacher marked me wrong but it think this is right

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicskid72
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Teacher
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework problem involving the momentum of a baseball hit by a batter. The initial momentum was calculated as -5.51 kg.m/s, leading to a final momentum of 7.59 kg.m/s and a final velocity of 52.3 m/s. Participants express confusion over the problem's wording, particularly regarding whether the change in momentum refers to vector components or magnitudes. Some believe the teacher's grading was unfair, suggesting the student's approach was reasonable given the ambiguity of the question. Overall, the consensus is that the problem lacks clarity, impacting the assessment of the student's solution.
physicskid72
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A batter hits a fastball that is traveling at -38 m/s,. The ball has a mass of 0.145 kg. The change in momentum in the ball is 13.1 kg.m/s. what is the balls final momentum?

B.) what is the final velocity of the baseball?


Homework Equations



deltaP = Pf - Pi

P = mv

The Attempt at a Solution



p initial = 0.145( -38.0) = -5.51 kg.m/s

so... 13.1 = Pf - (-5.51)

Pf = 13.1 - 5.51
= 7.59 kg.m/s

b.) Pf = mvf

7.59= 0.145vf
vf = 52.3 m/s

I thought this problem was pretty basic, but i got 0 out of 4 for it, what do you guys get for a solution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This looks right to me...
 
physicskid72 said:
I thought this problem was pretty basic, but i got 0 out of 4 for it, what do you guys get for a solution?

The question is a little vague, but I'd answer it as you did.

What is confusing is that the wording does not make it clear whether the change in momentum is a vector component change, or vector magnitude change. A magnitude change would imply an impossibly fast speed, so I would answer as you did. However, a vector component change is still vague because we don't know what direction the ball was hit in. There may be x, y and z components of the momentum. So, your method is still not really correct unless the ball was hit directly into the pitcher's face.

Personally, I give your teacher 0 points on this one, unless you've misrepresented the original wording of the question.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
8K
Back
Top