My Theory of Gravity: Mass Causes Time Dilation & Attraction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Boeley
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Theory
AI Thread Summary
Gravity is theorized to be caused by differences in time rather than mass itself, suggesting that objects accelerate towards areas of slower time. This concept implies that light bends around massive objects due to the time dilation experienced in their vicinity, creating the appearance of curvature. The theory posits that mass displaces space-time, leading to time dilation and subsequently, gravitational attraction. The denser a particle, the more it displaces space-time, resulting in greater time dilation and attraction. The discussion was ultimately halted due to forum rules against speculative theories.
Boeley
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

I've been trying to satisfy my curiosity about gravity for some time now. And I would like to share what I believe to be how gravity works.

Attraction between objects is caused by differences in time. We all know speed = distance / time, so if an object at rest is experiencing different times across it, it will tend to accelerate in the direction which time is slowest. Because the object is being accelerated at different rates across it, this would also explain stretching caused by "gravity".

Light traveling near large objects would bend toward the slower time as well. While across an entire beam the light never travels less than c, the light closest to the body will travel through slower time, thus causing it to appear to bend (slower time means less distance traveled - if it all traveled the same distance, the light in slower time would be greater than c). It travels in a straight light through space-time, but appears to bend to us.

Mass does not cause attraction, mass causes time dilation which causes attraction. So how does mass cause time dilation?

Matter occupies space-time. Space-time and matter cannot occupy the same space, so matter pushes space-time out of a particular space and causes a "bend" in space-time - time dilation. The more dense a particle is, the more space-time it displaces, the more time dilation there is, the more attraction.

So it would be accurate to say that a very, very small particle occupies only a tiny fraction of space-time. Or that a very, very small particle exists in a particular place in some space-times, but in no place in particular in others. The heavier the particle, the more likely it is to exist in a particular time-space.

Thanks for taking the time to read this, feedback would be most welcome. I hope I've explained it well enough.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dear PF user,

Although it is not clear whether you are talking about a particular interpretation of the formalism of general relativity or whether you are vaguely proposing a new theory of gravity, we would like to remind you that in most sections of PF speculation about new theories in the way you do is prohibited - this is explained in the PF rules you agreed upon when you signed up. So we will stop the discussion here.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Back
Top