B "Mysterious" beamsplitter cube

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around unexpected behavior observed when using a non-polarizing beamsplitter cube in an experiment. Instead of the anticipated output of two beams—one passing through and one reflecting at a 90-degree angle—the beam exits in all four directions, including reflections back to the source. Participants suggest that internal reflections off the glass-air boundary could cause this phenomenon, and that visual assessments of beam intensity may not be reliable. One user mentions that alignment issues might be contributing to the problem and recommends checking the input face for proper alignment. The conversation highlights the complexities of beamsplitter behavior and the importance of precise setup in optical experiments.
boxfullofvacuumtubes
Messages
19
Reaction score
2
I'm using a non-polarizing beamsplitter cube in an experiment, but it's behaving in an unexpected way. I expected that, if a laser beam enters the cube from one side, ~50% of the beam passes through the cube in the same direction, while ~50% of the beam is reflected and exits the cube at a 90-degree angle. So, one beam entering the cube and two beams exiting the cube.

Instead, the beam seems to exit the cube in all 4 directions: passing through, exiting left, exiting right, and even being reflected back to the source. Is this expected behavior? What is causing it?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about the intensities ?
 
Last edited:
I didn't measure intensities, but, visually, the beams along the two "expected" axes look ~50% stronger.
 
boxfullofvacuumtubes said:
Instead, the beam seems to exit the cube in all 4 directions: passing through, exiting left, exiting right, and even being reflected back to the source. Is this expected behavior? What is causing it?

Internal reflections off of the glass-air boundary will likely reflect part of the beam out of the other two faces, but the intensities should be fairly weak.

boxfullofvacuumtubes said:
I didn't measure intensities, but, visually, the beams along the two "expected" axes look ~50% stronger.

Don't trust your eyes. They aren't very good measuring devices. This is a known problem with the version 1.0's and I'd replace them as soon as the first upgraded models come out. :rolleyes:
 
  • Like
Likes Tom.G and BvU
boxfullofvacuumtubes said:
I'm using a non-polarizing beamsplitter cube in an experiment, but it's behaving in an unexpected way. I expected that, if a laser beam enters the cube from one side, ~50% of the beam passes through the cube in the same direction, while ~50% of the beam is reflected and exits the cube at a 90-degree angle. So, one beam entering the cube and two beams exiting the cube.

Instead, the beam seems to exit the cube in all 4 directions: passing through, exiting left, exiting right, and even being reflected back to the source. Is this expected behavior? What is causing it?

Thanks!

I've noticed a similar phenomenon, in my case it seems to be an 'alignment' problem- using a different input face may fix the problem. The manufacturer may place a marking on the cube to help alignment, I'm not entirely sure how these devices work:

https://www.thorlabs.com/newgrouppage9.cfm?objectgroup_id=754
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'A scenario of non uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...

Similar threads

Back
Top