Narrow slits causes a diffraction pattern

Tac-Tics
Messages
816
Reaction score
7
In the famous two-split experiment in your freshman college class, you learn that shining a light at a wall with two narrow slits causes a diffraction pattern.

Something that's always bothered me is in these ideal setups, we always assume the wall is a continuous barrier to the light. But the barrier is made up of a lattice of atoms. The interaction is never as simple as the idealized experiment. I'm curious as to what's actually going on between the light and the wall.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


In simple terms, the EM field in the light hitting the wall causes electrons in the atoms of whatever the wall is made of to move. Moving charges create an electromagnetic field at the same frequency - which forms the light emitted back at you.

By the time it gets to the screen, it doesn't matter if it came form a slit or just pointing the laser directly at the wall.

A far more puzzling question is how do you get a speckle pattern when you shine a laser at the wall - where is the laser ligth interfering ?
 


mgb_phys said:
In simple terms, the EM field in the light hitting the wall causes electrons in the atoms of whatever the wall is made of to move. Moving charges create an electromagnetic field at the same frequency - which forms the light emitted back at you.

By the time it gets to the screen, it doesn't matter if it came form a slit or just pointing the laser directly at the wall.

A far more puzzling question is how do you get a speckle pattern when you shine a laser at the wall - where is the laser ligth interfering ?

So the same wave of light hits two atoms, and they hesitate a second and then release the wave back out all in all directions, right? Since the atoms are not in the same position, it creates an interference pattern. That doesn't seem so puzzling. (Though I know single-particle interference might seem a bit more so).

One problem I'm having in understanding this is when does like travel like a ray and when does it get sent out in all directions? It seems that the light has momentum in a particular directions when it strikes an atom, so it would need to be moving the same direction when it is re-emitted. (But that contradicts what I just said about it being released in all different directions).
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top