Natural Units: What is the Conversion Process?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoePhysicsNut
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Natural Units
AI Thread Summary
Natural units simplify the conversion of mass from kilograms to MeV/c^2 and MeV, with the key point being that the numerical value remains unchanged when transitioning from MeV/c^2 to MeV. In natural units, the speed of light (c) is set to 1, which alters the interpretation of units but not their numerical equivalence. The conversion process involves using specific constants, but once in natural units, the mass is expressed differently without additional multiplication. The discussion clarifies that while the numerical values are the same, the definitions of MeV and MeV/c^2 differ in their compatibility with SI units. Understanding these conversions is crucial for accurate calculations in physics.
JoePhysicsNut
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
I'm slightly confused about natural units.

Take mass as an example: I can measure something in kg's, but then decide to convert to MeV/c^2, for instance. To do that I would multiply the quantity in kg by 3*10^8 squared and divide by 10^6*1.6*1-^(-19) i.e. the SI values of the constants. If I then want to express the mass in natural units, which would be MeV instead of MeV/c^2, would I multiply by 3*10^8 squared again?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JoePhysicsNut said:
I'm slightly confused about natural units.

Take mass as an example: I can measure something in kg's, but then decide to convert to MeV/c^2, for instance. To do that I would multiply the quantity in kg by 3*10^8 squared and divide by 10^6*1.6*1-^(-19) i.e. the SI values of the constants. If I then want to express the mass in natural units, which would be MeV instead of MeV/c^2, would I multiply by 3*10^8 squared again?

OK, so I've figured out that the answer is no I shouldn't multply by 3*10^8 squared again. The mass would be the same number in MeV/c^2 as it is in MeV, only in the latter case it's measured in natural units.

But to rephrase my question: if the number didn't change when going from MeV/c^2 to MeV, did the definition or "size" of MeV change?
 
In natural units, c=1. MeV/c^2 is compatible with SI units, MeV is not.

$$1kg = 1kg\frac{m^2}{s^2} \frac{s^2}{m^2} = 1J \frac{s^2}{(3\cdot 10^8 m)^2} 9\cdot 10^{16} = 1J/c^2 \cdot 9\cdot 10^{16}$$
$$1J=1C\cdot 1V = 6\cdot 10^{18} q_e \cdot 1V = 6\cdot 10^{12}MeV$$
Therefore:
$$1kg = 1J/c^2 \cdot 9\cdot 10^{16} = 5.4\cdot 10^{29}\frac{MeV}{c^2}$$
As you can see, I did not multiply with anything, I just converted units.
(a better value for the inverse electric charge would give 5.61 instead of 5.4)
 
Last edited:
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Back
Top