Navier Stokes Equations - General Question

AI Thread Summary
The Navier-Stokes equations incorporate both pressure and gravity terms to accurately represent fluid dynamics, particularly in geophysical contexts. The pressure term accounts for forces due to fluid density and temperature variations, while the gravity term represents the body force acting on the fluid. These terms cannot be combined because they represent different physical phenomena; pressure forces drive fluid motion, while body forces like gravity indicate potential energy differences. Understanding this distinction is crucial for analyzing fluid behavior in systems with varying altitudes and densities. The momentum equation illustrates this balance by equating changes in momentum to the sum of pressure, viscous, and body forces.
gilgtc
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
(This is from the perspective of Geophysical Fluid Dynamics)

In the Navier Stokes equations I am confused as to why there is both a pressure term and a gravity term. Is this pressure resulting from differences in densities and temperature differences alone? I would think that the gravity term would be lumped into the pressure term. Can someone please clarify?

I am sorry if this makes no sense I am just trying to understand,

Thanks for your help.

g
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Engineering-wise a look into energy balance is always comfortable. If in the system there are two distinct bodies of fluid, having same velocity, density, pressure and temperature, but at different altitudes, the system still has the energy potential to do something. If the gravity term would be missing from Navier-Stokes equations, then they would not show this potential.

--
Chusslove Illich (Часлав Илић)
 
gravity is usually shown for the body force component. However this can also be centrifugal force etc.
 
the pressure term should be for the pressure force driving the fluid. In compressible flow this is the same pressure that change with temperature and density. The body force is of different nature. It cannot be lump into the pressure term. Perhaps because all terms on RHS are forces, and this gives you the impression that they can be lump together. In fact, they are different.

the momentum equation:

Change of momentum = pressure force + viscous force + body force
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...

Similar threads

Back
Top