Converting Navier-Stokes Equations to Lagrangian Frame of Reference

  • Thread starter Thread starter cahill8
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To convert the Navier-Stokes equations to the Lagrangian frame of reference, one must recognize that the Lagrangian approach involves tracking fluid particles as they move, contrasting with the fixed control volume of the Eulerian frame. The right-hand side of the equations, which includes pressure, must be expressed in terms of time derivatives rather than spatial derivatives. This leads to the use of total (or substantial) derivatives, represented as ρD⟨V⟩/Dt, instead of the partial derivative ρ∂⟨V⟩/∂t. Understanding the concept of total derivatives is crucial for this conversion. Additional assistance can be provided if needed.
cahill8
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am asked to write down the momentum (navier-stokes equations) equations in the Lagrangian coordinate system. Gravity and viscosity can be ignored.

Homework Equations


[PLAIN]http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/974/65019601.jpg (Eulerian Frame)

The Attempt at a Solution


Am I correct in thinking that I only need to change the RHS to change with time instead of position? The RHS only contains p, so can I split this up into px, py, pz? I can't seem to find any relevant information anywhere.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
No, the fundamental difference between Eulerian and Lagrangian frames of reference (not coordinate systems) is that with Eulerian, the control volume is fixed in space, whereas Lagrangian moves with the flow.

The effect this has on the equations is that you end up with total (also called substantial) derivatives in the Lagrangian frame of reference. You'll end with something like:
<br /> \rho\frac{D\vec{V}}{Dt}<br />
Rather than
<br /> \rho\frac{\partial \vec{V}}{\partial t}<br />

You need to understand what a total derivative is to convert what you have into the Lagrangian form. If you need more help, let me know.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top