Need a bit of homework help about % mass of elements

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the percentage by mass of elements in compounds, use the formula: (mass of element in compound / mass of total compound) * 100%. For MgBr2, consider the contribution of two bromide ions. In Ca(NO3)2, account for the nitrogen and oxygen from the nitrate groups. For NH4NO3, include the masses of both nitrogen sources. Understanding the molecular composition is crucial for accurate calculations.
rpatel
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Calculate the percentage by mass of the elements shown in the following compounds

A) Br in MgBr2

b) O in Ca(NO3)2

c) N in NH4NO3


any help is appreichated

thanks

regards
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the percent mass will be equal to [mass of element in compound]/[mass of total compound]*100%. The only thing to watch out for is when a compound has a few atoms of the same element in it. [ie: for the first one you have 2 bromide ions so the answer would be 2*molecular mass of bromide / mass of magnesium (II) bromide * 100%]
 
Last edited:
thank you. :smile:
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top