Need an explanation -- Consider pure water separated from....

AI Thread Summary
In a scenario where pure water is separated from an aqueous starch solution by a semipermeable membrane, the concentration of the starch solution will decrease over time. This is because water can move freely across the membrane, leading to dilution of the starch solution. The confusion arises from the assumption that the volume of starch remains constant while water is lost, but the key point is that water can move into the starch solution, affecting its concentration. The discussion clarifies that the initial interpretation of concentration was incorrect, as it does not account for the movement of water. Understanding the dynamics of the semipermeable membrane is crucial to grasping the changes in concentration.
andkand97
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Please post this type of questions in HW section using the template.
Consider pure water separated from an aqueous starch solution by a semipermeable membrane, which allows water to pass freely but not starch. After some time has elapsed, the concentration of starch solution
a. will have increased
b. will have decreased
c. will not have changed
d. might have increased or decreased, depending on other factor.
e. will be the same on both sides of the membrane

The answer key says that the answer is b. will have decreased. This doesn't make sense to me. My understanding is that if the water is gone, the volume the starch is occupying has decreased but the amount of starch stayed the same. Intuitively, this would lead me to believe that the concentration has increased (assuming by concentration they mean something like molarity, where molarity = moles of solute/ volume ). My dad, who has a PhD in Chemistry, agrees with me. Can someone explain to me why it would decrease? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why do you think water will be gone?
 
Borek said:
Why do you think water will be gone?
Well, the question says "consider pure water separated from an aqueous solution by a semipermeable membrane". Isn't the water being separated from the starch solution?
 
What it means is you have two solutions and a semipermeable membrane between them (separating them as in "don't allowing a direct mix"), it doesn't say anything about what is happening to water (other than that it can freely move - but it is up to you to decide which way it moves).
 
Borek said:
What it means is you have two solutions and a semipermeable membrane between them (separating them as in "don't allowing a direct mix"), it doesn't say anything about what is happening to water (other than that it can freely move - but it is up to you to decide which way it moves).
Oh, okay that makes more sense. Thanks!
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top