Need axial tilt info of earth daily

  • Thread starter Thread starter axialhelp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axial Earth Tilt
AI Thread Summary
The Earth's axial tilt remains constant at approximately 23.4°, with minor variations due to nutation and long-term changes. While the tilt itself does not change throughout the year, the angle between the Earth's axis and the Sun varies, affecting seasonal changes. During the summer solstice, the tilt is at its maximum, while it reaches zero at the equinoxes and is at its minimum during the winter solstice. For precise calculations of the axial tilt on specific days, tools like sun path charts and spreadsheets can be utilized. Halving the axial tilt would result in less extreme seasons, making summers and winters more similar to spring and autumn.
axialhelp
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
so i wanted to know for my own GK about Earth's daily axial tilt.So far i have found only axial tilt on solstice and equinox.
there is one way but it is cumbersome and that is to manually find it
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hello, axialhelp. Welcome to PF.

Axial tilt of the Earth is always the same. There's some variation due to nutation and long term(thousands of years) perturbations, but in the time scale of human life or without the need for extreme precision, the angle of tilt remains 23,4° at all times.
This is the angle at which the Earth's axis is tilted away from the line perpendicular to the plane of its orbit.

What does change during the year, is the relative position of the Sun with respect to the direction the axis is pointing.

This causes the angle between the axis and the plane perpendicular to the direction to the Sun(the plane that bisects the Earth in two halves: the illuminated one and the one in shadow, or, day and night halves) to change from the maximum of 23,4° at Summer solstice, through 0° at equinoxes, to -23,4° at Winter solstice.

To find this angle at any given day of the year empirically, you need to do exactly what that BBC video told you to do.
If it's any time between the solstices, you'll get the angle between -23,4<α<23,4.
They even got such a result themselves, due to making measurements a few days before the summer solstice, as the lady tells you at the end of the video.

You could use sun path charts, like this one(http://solardat.uoregon.edu/PolarSunChartProgram.html) to get the data you need for the calculations without leaving your room.

Alternatively, to a good approximation, you can just use this equation to get the angle you want:
α=23.4\sin({\frac{2\pi}{365}x}) where x is the day of the year counting from the spring equinox. When calculating remember that the value in the sine function is in radians, but the end result is in degrees.
 
Thanks but i am unable to understand it or compute it.CAn you compute the axial tilt of Earth every 15 days starting from dec 21?. is there any website which has the axial tilt for each day? .
Anyways my question was i wanted to find out the effects on Earth if the axial tilt would be halved by 50%. How would the season be ?

http://io9.com/5829438/earth-doesnt-need-the-moon
 
Are you trying to do some kind of astrography or sun angle project? In other words, what are you trying to figure out, in plain words? The answer is not change in axial tilt, it is change in ______ relative to: ______ (you fill in the blanks).

Your attached link shows the sun's angle versus the Zenith -> to get the axial tilt of the earth: 23.4 deg -- On the summer Solstice @noon. The axial tilt does not change (from a normal human perspective anyway) all through the year. The angle of the sun at astronomical noon changes, but if you correct for that you get the same answer over and over.
 
Last edited:
axialhelp said:
Thanks but i am unable to understand it or compute it.CAn you compute the axial tilt of Earth every 15 days starting from dec 21?. is there any website which has the axial tilt for each day?
Spreadsheets are your friend.
http://speedy.sh/3kARu/sunposition.ods
(it's an Open Office file)

There's two spreadsheets there.

The first one calculates the deviation from the position of the Sun at noon during equinoxes(in degrees).
At equinoxes, the Sun's elevation is equal to 90° minus your lattitude. The value calculated is the angular distance that the Sun appears to move up and down from that point over the year.

The second one calculates the actual position of the Sun at noon as measured from above the Southern horizon. It's simply 90° minus your lattitude plus the deviation value.

I'm guessing these are the values you are looking for.

You can enter new values into the cyan-coloured cells. The first one is the axial tilt, which, we cannot stress this more, does not change.
The second one is the lattitude from which you're observing the Sun.

It uses the same equation as provided in post #2, which assumes circular orbit. This is not really the case with Earth, so keep in mind that actual values will differ slightly.
There's also the case of refraction, that causes the Sun to appear higher above the horizon than it really is. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atmospheric_refraction) This effect is obviously not included, so the values close to the horizon will differ some more in reality.

Anyways my question was i wanted to find out the effects on Earth if the axial tilt would be halved by 50%. How would the season be ?
You should be able to see that the position of the Sun would deviate less from the equinox position, which means that Summer and Winter would be less extreme and more like Spring or Autumn.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top