Need help finding the restraining reaction force for a beam

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the restraining reaction forces at hinges A and E of a beam affected by a known couple. Participants analyze the forces and moments acting on the structure, leading to calculations for the reactions, specifically noting that N(C) and N(E) form a couple. There is some confusion regarding the official answer, which states R_A = m/(2a) and R_E = √2 m/a, but participants find their calculations align with these results despite initial discrepancies. The conversation also touches on the potential indeterminacy of the problem due to horizontal forces at hinges A and B. Ultimately, the group emphasizes the need for clarity in calculations and diagrams to resolve the issue.
Kile
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
1. The illustrated structure is affected by a known couple, and try to figure out the restraining reaction force of the hinge A and hinge E.
LW9hyYP.jpg


We should analyse ECD instead. Since arm CD is a two force members, so N(C) in in the direction where CD connects by these two points. The distance from E to diagonal CD is a/√2. So we have N(C)=√2 m/a. Because N(C)=N(E) ( N(C) and N(E) together form a couple), N(E)=√2 m/a.
Where did I go wrong?
 

Attachments

  • LW9hyYP.jpg
    LW9hyYP.jpg
    57 KB · Views: 777
Physics news on Phys.org
Kile said:
Where did I go wrong?
I agree with your reasoning and answer. Who says it is wrong? What other answer is given ?
 
haruspex said:
I agree with your reasoning and answer. Who says it is wrong? What other answer is given ?
The official answer just doesn't match mine.
 
Kile said:
The official answer just doesn't match mine.
Ok, but what is the official answer?
 
R_A= \frac m 2a, R_E=\frac \sqrt {{2} m} a,
 
Your latex had some errors. In fixing it up I arrived at
Kile said:
##R_A= \frac m{ 2a}##, ## R_E=\frac {\sqrt {2} m} a##,
But that makes the reaction at E the same as you got, so perhaps you meant something else.
 
haruspex said:
Your latex had some errors. In fixing it up I arrived at

But that makes the reaction at E the same as you got, so perhaps you meant something else.
Yes. You did it in the right format. Do u know how to get this official answer?
 
Kile said:
Yes. You did it in the right format. Do u know how to get this official answer?
As I wrote, it's the same as your answer, just written differently. They both say ##(\sqrt 2)(\frac ma)##.
 
How did u get ##N_A## ?
Can u draw a diagram to illustrate?
 
  • #10
Kile said:
How did u get ##N_A## ?
Can u draw a diagram to illustrate?
I thought we were discussing NE.
For NA, take moments about the other hinge.
 
  • #11
How can u get it? can u help me out?
 
  • #12
Kile said:
How can u get it? can u help me out?
Consider the whole frame as one body. If you take the B hinge as axis, what moments are there?
 
  • #13
zcrgSYO.png
Because point B has a pulley on the ground, ##N_B## is vertical.
Choose A be centroid
$$\sum m_A (F)=0, ~2a N_B + m=0$$
$$\Rightarrow N_B=\frac {-m} {2a},$$ So it's downward.
X-axis, $$X_A=0$$
Y-axis, $$Y_A=0 $$ $$N_B + Y_A=0$$
$$\Rightarrow Y_A= -N_B = \frac {m} {2a}$$ So ##Y_A## it's upward.
 

Attachments

  • zcrgSYO.png
    zcrgSYO.png
    150.9 KB · Views: 709
Last edited:
  • #14
Kile said:
View attachment 240415 Because point B has a pulley on the ground, ##N_B## is vertical.
Choose A be centroid
$$\sum m_A (F)=0, 2a N_B + m=0$$
$$\Rightarrow N_B=\frac {-m} {2a},$$ So it's downward.
X-axis, $$X_A=0$$
Y-axis, $$Y_A=0 $$ $$N_B + Y_A=0$$
$$\Rightarrow Y_A= -N_B = \frac {m} {2a}$$ So ##Y_A## it's upward.
Right... except, strictly speaking there could be equal and opposite horizontal forces at A and B, making the problem indeterminate.
 
  • #15
haruspex said:
Right... except, strictly speaking there could be equal and opposite horizontal forces at A and B, making the problem indeterminate.
You mean $$X_A = X_ B$$ It may not equals to 0.
We just can't calculate it from the information already given.
Is that what you are trying to say here?
 
  • #16
Kile said:
You mean $$X_A = X_ B$$ It may not equals to 0.
We just can't calculate it from the information already given.
Is that what you are trying to say here?
Right, except XA=-XB. And if not zero then it changes YA and YB so as to balance the torque.
 
Back
Top