Need help for one-to one linear transformation

angela123
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Question: Let T:V-->W and S:W-->U be linear transformation.Show that
1) If T and S are one-to-one,then ST is one-to one
2) If ST is one-to-one,then T is one-to-one
3)Give example of two linear transformations T and S, such
that ST is one-to-one ,but S is not.

For 1),Since T is one-to-one,there is some vector in V,such that T(v)=O
Since S is one-to-one,there is some vector in W,such that S(w)=O
If ST is one-to-one,then there is some vector t in T,such that
ST(t)=S(T(t))=O,so how could I proof T(t)=w?

How about question 2) &3)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since T is one-to-one,there is some vector in V,such that T(v)=O
How many are there?
 
It could be more than One vector in V, such that T(v)=O,I know Ker T=O


Angela
 
Sorry, I made a mistake,It has only One vector in V, such that T(v)=O




Angela
 
Here is one way to do:
2) If ST is one-to-one,then T is one-to-one

Proof: Suppose T is not one-to-one. Then there exists x, y in V, x != y, such that T(x) = T(y).Then ST(x) = S(T(x)) = S(T(y)) = ST(y) but x != y, and thus ST is not one-to-one.

You should try to give a direct proof for practice. Also notice the fact that S and T are linear transformations was never used and so this result holds for functions in general.
 
Last edited:
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top