Need help getting started with QM

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Rev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
The Rev
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
I just got done reading Gribbin's "In Search of Schrodinger's Cat" and I am hooked! Quantum Mechanics is one of the most evocative and fascinating subjects I have ever come across, and I would like to learn a lot more about it. The only problem is, I don't know enough to know where to start.

My questions are, what level of math do I need to gain the greatest understanding of QM?

and,

What are some books that are more detailed and comprehensive than Gribbin, which I can study to learn more, but are still somewhat accessible to someone who still lacks the math to really dig into QM?

Thanks for you help.



The Rev
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1: here's a couple of threads about math and QM: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=69664&page=1&pp=15&highlight=math
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=69846&highlight=math

You can get an good idea about what's needed just for the basics in those. To get to the bottom of the whole field you need very very good and broad selection of mathematical skills and knowledge. Way broader than mine. Basic QM courses in theoretical physics usually require you to know calculus, differential equations, complex analysis, linear algebra and special functions.

2: I really can't recommend anything since I don't know how good your math skills are.
 
You'd know quite a bit of math,if u were to understand the 6 axioms...I've had almost a semester of maths preparation for the an understanding of the 6 axioms...

Daniel.
 
The Rev said:
I just got done reading Gribbin's "In Search of Schrodinger's Cat" and I am hooked! Quantum Mechanics is one of the most evocative and fascinating subjects I have ever come across, and I would like to learn a lot more about it. The only problem is, I don't know enough to know where to start.

My questions are, what level of math do I need to gain the greatest understanding of QM?
I'm sorry but I don't know how to quantify the math you need into "levels." However if you look here

http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/qm/qm.htm

you'll get a good idea. Basically that math used is at the level of advanced calculus, linear algebra, Fourier analysis, complex analysis and a rudimentary understanding of probability would help.

Pete
The Rev[/QUOTE]
 
From all of your posts, I can see that it'll be awhile before I have the math chops to really dig into the grit of Quantum Mechanics. I'm still getting through the High School stuff (Algebra, Geometry, Trig), so I see myself reading popularized books like Gribbin's for the foreseeable future.

Would anyone care to make a book recommendation for a layman?

X

The Rev
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top