Need help in explaining the calculation of n-th power of a summation

duranta23
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi

I got to the following equation while going through a book. I can't figure out how the second line comes from the first. Can anyone please help me understand?

(1/2*\sum_{q=-Q}^Q V_s,q .H(w_q) .exp(iw_q t))^n is written as,

1/2^n * \sum_{q1=-Q}^Q \sum_{q2=-Q}^Q ... \sum_{qn=-Q}^Q V_s,q1 . V_s,q2 ... V_s,qn .H(w_q1).H(w_q2)...H(w_qn).exp(i(w_q1 +w_q2 +...w_qn).t)

Please forgive my poor latex style writing.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, I can forgive it, but unfortunately I can't read it.
 
(1/2*\sum_{q=-Q}^Q V_{s,q} .H(w_q) .exp(iw_q t))^n

is written as,

1/2^n * \sum_{q_1=-Q}^Q \sum_{q_2=-Q}^Q ... \sum_{q_n=-Q}^Q V_{s,q_1} . V_{s,q_2} ... V_{s,q_n} .H(w_{q_1}).H(w_{q_2})...H(w_{q_n}).exp(i(w_{q_1} +w_{q_2} +...w_{q_n}).t)

The above is hopefully closer. I don't know if its just me, but I see quite a few posts with unprocessed Latex.
 
Last edited:
And if you have

(A\sum_{i=r}^s a_i)^n=A^n(a_r+a_{r+1}\dots a_s)(a_r+a_{r+1}\dots a_s)\dots (a_r+a_{r+1}\dots a_s)\text{ (to }n\text{ factors})

you get

A^n(\Sigma a_{i_1}a_{i_2}\dots a_{i_n}})

where the sum on the second line runs through all different ways of selecting each a_{i_k} from the corresponding bracket on the rhs of the first line.

This can be written as

A^n\sum_{i_1=r}^s\sum_{i_2=r}^s\dots \sum_{i_n=r}^s a_{i_1}a_{i_2}\dots a_{i_n}}

and as the indices run from r to s in each of the multiple sums, all ways of selecting a_{i_1}a_{i_2}\dots a_{i_n} will occur exactly once.

With appropriate values inserted from your example this gives you the transition between the first and second lines.
 
Makes Perfect sense. Thank you so much for the explanation :D and special thanks for forgiving my latex :P
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top