Should I Drop Classes I Dislike for Better Grades or Keep Them for More Credits?

  • Thread starter Thread starter colldood
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decision
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a third-year undergraduate student weighing the decision to drop one or both of two challenging courses—atomic physics and relativistic electrodynamics—that are not required for their degree. The student is concerned about their GPA, currently around 3.7, and the potential impact of dropping courses on their graduate school applications. Key points include the importance of maintaining a high GPA, as it is a significant factor for grad school admissions, and the understanding that many students drop classes for various reasons, which admissions committees typically recognize. Participants suggest considering how the student ranks compared to peers, the relevance of the courses to future studies, and the idea that knowledge gained from difficult courses may be beneficial in graduate school. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards prioritizing GPA while acknowledging that a semester with fewer courses is unlikely to negatively affect graduate school prospects.
colldood
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

I'm a third year undergrad student taking Physics & Math. I'm not sure which of the two I'm going to go to grad school for yet, but both are a possibility. I recently got back some bad test marks for these two classes I'm in that I really dislike (atomic physics, and relativistic electrodynamics). Neither are required for my program, but at this rate I'll probably be getting around a 75 (3.0 GPA) in each (I always do well on problem sets). Maybe 80 (3.7) if I'm really lucky, but I also did much worse on the midterm than I expected so I could very well do horribly on the exam (maybe bring it down to a 70 i.e. 2.7). I'm thinking of dropping one or both of them, which would leave me in only three courses for the semester. My GPA up to this point is about 3.7, constant through the years.

Now, the question is: is it better to drop one or both of them, and have (I'm guessing) a 3.8 average with 4 full credits for the year, or have 5 full credits and have presumably a 3.5-3.6 for the year. Is it better to have the knowledge under my belt with mediocre marks, or to just do better with fewer courses? Remember, neither are required for my program. Will grad schools care that I took only 3 courses for a semester? This is the point I'm wondering most about. Will they expect me to do better in my three courses for this semester as a result? I have a credit from high school, so having enough credits for a degree is not an issue.

What should I do? I have to decide soon.

Thanks for your responses.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have to decide by tomorrow...please, any input would be appreciated greatly.
 
I am no expert, but since you are desperate for some guidance, I will offer *my* opinion. Although GPA is not the only thing that grad schools look at, it *probably* trumps most other criteria. So whatever you can do to keep your GPA as high as possible is probably the best decision.

A lot of people end up dropping a class for some reason or the other during their college career. I think grad schools realize this. Just my two cents though. Good luck! :smile:
 
I won't argue the point on marks. They are important. But at the same time, just because you aren't acing a class isn't a good reason to drop it.

The first thing I would try to figure out is how you stand in relation to the rest of the class. Having a bad test mark isn't all that bad if everyone has a bad test mark. Or do you mean you did poorly in relation to the class average?

The next thing I would figure out is how relevant these classes are. Just because they aren't required for your degree doesn't mean they're not important. When you elected to pursue these ones rather than something else, you thought they were important. Has that changed? And further along those lines, my own personal experience has been that the more physics I learned, the better, when it came to graduate school.

On the other hand, I doubt a graduate admissions committee would blink at a single semester with only 3 courses. They admit people who complete undergraduate degrees part time after all.
 
Considering that the classes you hate will come up again (and again) in grad school, you may want to consider this in your planning.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Back
Top