Need help: Trying to find the mass of a tortoise shell using a lever

AI Thread Summary
To find the mass of a tortoise shell using a lever, the user has measured the volume of the shell parts and is attempting to calculate the mass based on torque equations. They have set up a system with known variables, including the mass of the lever and the center of mass locations. However, they are struggling to determine the torque from the support due to the non-uniform distribution of force along the lever. The discussion emphasizes that a torque balance equation is sufficient for solving the problem, despite the complexity of the force distribution. The user seeks guidance on modeling this torque effectively to approximate the shell's mass.
Nick O
Messages
158
Reaction score
8
I have a tortoise shell sitting in two parts on my desk (the top and the bottom). I somehow got it in my head that it would be fun to use it as an enclosure for a robot, and I need to know its mass when I choose motors for it.

Now, I don't have any precise mass-measurement tools - all I have is a bathroom scale whose needle won't even deflect for something as light as this shell. So I thought, "hey, I'm an engineering student, I can do this without a scale". I found the volume of the two parts with water and a measuring cup (75 and 20 mL for top and bottom). In theory, I can calculate the mass of the bottom once I have calculated the density of the top.

To calculate the mass of the top part of the shell, I set up the following system:

system.png


The mass acting as a lever is 1.9 kg. The center of mass is 5.5 in from the left, and the edge of the support is 5.75 in from the left. The shell's point of contact is 9.375 in from the left, and this is where the support just starts to revolve.

On the surface, it appeared straightforward to get a reasonable approximation of the mass. It would start something like this:

M = mass of lever
m = mass of shell
n = normal force on lever from support
g = acceleration due to gravity
CG = center of gravity
positive forces are up
positive torques are counterclockwise

n - Mg - mg = 0
τCG - τsupport - τshell = 0

On first inspection, it looks like two equations and two unknowns, which should be readily solveable. The problem is that I have no idea how to find τsupport, because force is continuously distributed from 0 to 5.75 inches, and probably varies linearly from zero to some maximum value such that the net force is |Mg + mg|. I don't know how to model this in terms of torque.

Does anyone have any suggestions?

Note: I realize that the fulcrum is so close to the center of gravity that a precise measurement will be difficult to find. A rough approximation is fine. More importantly, I want to learn how to solve this sort of problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nick O said:
I have no idea how to find τsupport, because force is continuously distributed from 0 to 5.75 inches
It will not be uniformly distributed.
Before the shell is added, the mean position of the normal force must be at the midpoint of the lever. As the load on the right side of the lever is increased, it will move to the right to compensate.
Tipping occurs when this mean position reaches the edge of the table. I.e. the entire normal force will be at that point.
The torque balance equation is the only one you need.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top