kostoglotov
- 231
- 6
imgur link: http://i.imgur.com/8TOXi9t.png
I am comfortable with the need to multiply the polynomial in front of e^{2x} by x^3, that makes perfect sense in terms of what the text has already said about how no term in the particular solution should duplicate a term in the complementary solution, and that itself is logical in terms of the linear independence of the solutions.
What I don't fully understand is the need to multiply the polynomials in front of the trig functions by x.
(D+Ex)\cos{3x} + (F+Gx)\sin{3x} already has non-duplicated terms in it, ie, Ex\cos{3x} and Gx\sin{3x}.
Why wouldn't it be sufficient to simply use (D+Ex)\cos{3x} + (F+Gx)\sin{3x} and assume that D and F will be zero or else absorbed by linearity into the undetermined constant coefficients of the corresponding trig functions in the complementary solution?
I have of course tried this, and it turns out that indeed the x\cos{3x} and x\sin{3x} terms cancel out when substituted back into the original differential equation, which is
imgur link: http://i.imgur.com/FLRpzcr.png
I've subbed the trial solution (D+Ex)\cos{3x} + (F+Gx)\sin{3x} into (D^2+9)y (the factor in the diff eq that produces the trig components of the RHS), and I can see how in this instance the x\cos{3x} and x\sin{3x} terms cancel out, leaving no x\sin{3x} term.
I have come to agree with the insufficiency of (D+Ex)\cos{3x} + (F+Gx)\sin{3x} in this particular case, but I don't know why or how this carries over to the general case.
Why wouldn't (D+Ex)\cos{3x} + (F+Gx)\sin{3x} generally be okay in the particular solution when no x\sin{3x} or x\cos{3x} terms appear in the complementary solution?