Need help understanding splitting fields

  • Thread starter Thread starter PsychonautQQ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fields Splitting
PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10
My textbook is going through an example on splitting fields. It asked to find a splitting field for x^4 - 6x^2 - 7 over the rational numbers. This polynomial factors to (x^2 - 7)*(x^2+1) which has roots of 7^(1/2) and i. So i figured the extension field E we are looking for is Q(i)(7^(1/2)), but my textbook jumps straight to Q(i)(2^(1/2).

is the squareroot of 7 an element of the simple extension of the rational numbers with the square root of two? I can't imagine it being (yet i can't imagine many things that are..).

Any mathamaverick want to shed some light on my situation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Doesn't it follow, if ##2^{1/2}## is in a field extension of the rationals that ##(7/2)( 2^{1/2}) ## is also on the field, e.g., by closure under multiplication? Your result is correct if you re not looking for a minimal extension.
 
  • Like
Likes PsychonautQQ
Okay, what am i missing? How does (7/2)*(2^(1/2)) show that the finite extensions of 7^(1/2) reduces to 2^(1/2)?
 
Ah, sorry, I misread, let me think again.
 
  • Like
Likes PsychonautQQ
It looks to me like a misprint. No, the extension fields containing p^{1/2} and q^{1/2}, for p and q prime, are NOT the same.
 
  • Like
Likes PsychonautQQ
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top