Need help using algebra to solve physics equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter clippers0319
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving an elastic and completely inelastic collision between two balls of different masses. The user seeks help with algebraically finding the final velocities of the balls after the collision. They correctly apply the conservation of momentum and kinetic energy principles but struggle with the algebraic manipulation of the equations. A step-by-step breakdown is provided, illustrating how to simplify the equations and solve for the final velocities, ultimately confirming that the solutions are -0.4 m/s for the 5 kg ball and 1.6 m/s for the 7.5 kg ball. Understanding the algebraic process is emphasized as crucial for solving similar problems.
clippers0319
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
My question is not so much what to do it is just i have problems solving for a certain equation.

A 5.00kg ball, moving to the right at a velocity of 2m/s on a frictionless table, collides head-on with a stationary 7.50kg ball. Find the final velocities of the balls if the collision is (a) elastic and (b) completely inelastic

for part A

I have m1v1f + m2v2f= m1vi1 +0
to solve for final velocity 1(the ball for 5kg) you use

vf1=(m1-m2/m1+m2)vi1

I really have no i do how to algebraically solve for vf1, can someone explain that to me because when i use the equation i get the right answer which is -.400m/s

To find vf2 we use the fact that it is an ellastic collision and the kinetic energy before and after is the same

1/2m1(vf1^2)+1/2m2(vf2^2)=1/2m1(vi1^2)+0
Using this i have to solve for vf2 but again i have a problem algebraically solving for vf2. But there is a similar example in the textbook so i used what they had to solve for vf1 and vf2 but they do not show the work

vf2=(2m1/m1+m2)vi1
answer should be 1.60m/s

My problem is not understand ellastic equations, it is how to solve the first equation for vf1 and the second for vf2. Can someone show me step by step how to use algebra to solve for vf2 with what i typed above,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
so i just did this in lab last week so I am able to help you...

1/2 m1(vi1^2) + 0 = 1/2m1(vf1^2) + 1/2 m2(vf2^2)

all the 1/2s cancel

m1(vi1^2) = m1(vf1^2) + m2(vf2^2)

momentum before = momentum after
m1(vi1) = m1(vf1) + m2(vf2) ---> vf1 = [m2(vf2) - m1(vi1)] / m1

plug vf1 solved above into equation

m1(vi1^2) = m1 ([m2vf2 - m1vi1] / m1)^2 + m2(vf2^2)

m1(vi1^2) = m1 [(m2vf2 - m1vi1)/m1][(m2vf2 - m1vi1)/m1] + m2(vf2^2)

m1(vi1^2)=m1/m2[m2^2(vf2^2) - 2m2vf2m1vi1 + m1^2(vi1^2)]+m2(vf2^2)

(m1/m2 = 1/m1 so multiply both sides by m1 to give the left side m1^2 and the right side m1m2(vf2^2) and everything else stays the same)

m1^2(vi1^2) =m2^2(vf2^2)-2m2vf2m1vi1 + m1^2(vi1^2) + m1m2(vf2^2)

the m1^2(vi1^2) on both sides cancel

0 = m2vf2(m2v2f - 2m1vi1 + m1vf2)

set m2v2f - 2m1vi1 + m1vf2 = 0
(please don't ask me why bc i didnt really understand bc my teacher just said well one of them must be equal to zero because the equation is equal to 0)

m2vf2 + m1vf2 = 2m1vi1

from here its easy to solve for vf2 then plug the solution into the momentum before = momentum after equation and solve for vf1

I had problems with the algebra for this too...i hate using variables and not numbers. I hope this helps and you can understand each step, its hard to type it all out. Good luck!
 
Last edited:
since yu have the masses sub for them in the 2 equations. you obtain
5 v1f + 7.5 v2f = 10 ...(1) and
(1/2) 5 v1f^2 + (1/2) 7.5 v2f^2 = (1/2) 20 ...(2)
now divide eq # (2) by (1/2) also
divide both eq by 5 to siplify - you get
v1f + 1.5 v2f = 2 ...(3) and
v1f^2 + 1.5 v2f^2 = 4 ...(4)
see how simple they became
solve # (3) for v1f and sub in # (4)
solve the quadratic you obtained from # (4)
you will get v2f
sub this value in # (3)
and here you go you obtain v1f
The answers I obtained for
v1f is - 0.4 m/s and for
v2f is 1.6 m/s
Best wishes.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
18K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top