Need help with half-life of C-14 question (exponents unit)

So to get the amount of radioactive material left (as opposed to the fraction of material left), you multiply the fraction of material left by the initial amount you started with. On the LHS, you have just that, the amount of material left, and on the RHS, you have the fraction of material left multiplied by the initial amount you started with.
  • #1
Gregory.gags
31
2
Question: Carbon-14 has a half-life of 5730 years. A bone is found in which [itex]\frac{7}{8}[/itex] of the original [16g of] carbon-14 has decayed. How old is the bone?

Formula: C(t)=Co([itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex])[itex]\frac{t}{H}[/itex] (it's hard to see but it says [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex] to the power of [itex]\frac{t}{H}[/itex])

C(t) - the number at time t
Co - the number or concentration at time 0
2-1 or ([itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex]) - because the amount is halving
t - represents the elapsed time since measuring started (same units as H)
H - the half life

What I did was :

C(t) = [itex]\frac{1}{8}[/itex] (since [itex]\frac{7}{8}[/itex] had already decayed) so i did
[itex]\frac{1}{8}[/itex]=16([itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex])[itex]\frac{t}{5730}[/itex]
I worked that out and got 40 110, which is wrong, but that doesn't matter right now. My problem is that the text worked it out this way:

they did everything the same as me except, after figuring the [itex]\frac{1}{8}[/itex] from the [itex]\frac{7}{8}[/itex] they multiplied it by 16 for some reason getting 2 for C(t). So they start off with 2=16([itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex])[itex]\frac{t}{5730}[/itex] and worked it out the same way I did. I can't figure out why they did [itex]\frac{1}{8}[/itex] * 16 ? Wouldn't they have to multiply the other side of the equation by another 16 too?
They then go on to say C(t)=Co=([itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex])[itex]\frac{t}{H}[/itex] but there is no way that can be true! Can someone please explain firstly why the multiply the [itex]\frac{1}{8}[/itex] by 16 in the first place, and secondly why they equate C(t) & Co & ([itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex])[itex]\frac{t}{H}[/itex] ??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
From what I gather, the multiplication is due to an attempt to divide a fraction by another fraction:

[itex]\frac{1}{8}\div\frac{1}{16}=\frac{1}{8}\times\frac{16}{1}[/itex]

This would cancel out the 16 on the RHS and leave you with:

[itex]2=\frac{1}{2}^\frac{t}{H}[/itex]

Also from what I understand, the last part must be false.

If [itex]c(t)=c_{0}[/itex] then [itex]t=0[/itex] and [itex]\frac{t}{H}=0[/itex], which means that [itex]\frac{1}{2}^\frac{t}{H}=1[/itex].
 
  • #3
You got the wrong idea. The initial condition is a constant. Since it says the original mass is 16g, that will be your initial mass. 1/8 of the 16grams is c(t) so c(t)=16(1/8)

put that into the formula: 16(1/8)= 16(1/2)^(t/H) and solve for t

C(t) is the mass after a time has passed. If 16grams is the original amount than after some time t it will have decayed. the problem tells you that you have 1/8 of the initial mass so you're told to find out how long it took for the 16grams to decay into 1/8 the original amount. Is that clear enough?
 
  • #4
AmritpalS said:
You got the wrong idea. The initial condition is a constant. Since it says the original mass is 16g, that will be your initial mass. 1/8 of the 16grams is c(t) so c(t)=16(1/8)

put that into the formula: 16(1/8)= 16(1/2)^(t/H) and solve for t

C(t) is the mass after a time has passed. If 16grams is the original amount than after some time t it will have decayed. the problem tells you that you have 1/8 of the initial mass so you're told to find out how long it took for the 16grams to decay into 1/8 the original amount. Is that clear enough?

if i understand what your saying, the C(t) = 16(1/8) so C=16 and t=1/8 but t on the RHS of the equation isn't equal to 1/8 or is it? other than that i get what your saying
 
  • #5
Gregory.gags said:
if i understand what your saying, the C(t) = 16(1/8) so C=16 and t=1/8 but t on the RHS of the equation isn't equal to 1/8 or is it? other than that i get what your saying

no what I am trying to say is the function is equal to 16/8 which is 2.. you see c(t) is the mass after a certain time period. the question asks you for the time given the c(t) value which is 1/8 the original amount
 
  • #6
Gregory.gags said:
Question: Carbon-14 has a half-life of 5730 years. A bone is found in which [itex]\frac{7}{8}[/itex] of the original [16g of] carbon-14 has decayed. How old is the bone?

Formula: C(t)=Co([itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex])[itex]\frac{t}{H}[/itex] (it's hard to see but it says [itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex] to the power of [itex]\frac{t}{H}[/itex])

C(t) - the number at time t
Co - the number or concentration at time 0
2-1 or ([itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex]) - because the amount is halving
t - represents the elapsed time since measuring started (same units as H)
H - the half life

What I did was :

C(t) = [itex]\frac{1}{8}[/itex] (since [itex]\frac{7}{8}[/itex] had already decayed) so i did
[itex]\frac{1}{8}[/itex]=16([itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex])[itex]\frac{t}{5730}[/itex]
I worked that out and got 40 110, which is wrong, but that doesn't matter right now. My problem is that the text worked it out this way:

Wrong, because on the LHS (left hand side), you're dealing with a fraction (of material left), whereas on the RHS, you're dealing with mass (of material you started with).

To stay consistent, you should deal either with fractions on both sides, or masses on both sides.

they did everything the same as me except, after figuring the [itex]\frac{1}{8}[/itex] from the [itex]\frac{7}{8}[/itex] they multiplied it by 16 for some reason getting 2 for C(t). So they start off with 2=16([itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex])[itex]\frac{t}{5730}[/itex] and worked it out the same way I did. I can't figure out why they did [itex]\frac{1}{8}[/itex] * 16 ?

To get the mass left after decay, you take the fraction left (which is 1/8) and multiply it by the mass you originally started with (which is 16g). Hence you get (1/8) * 16 = 2g left after the decay.

Wouldn't they have to multiply the other side of the equation by another 16 too?

Why? The C0 on the RHS refers to the initial mass of 16g. It's not a fraction. Why would you multiply that again by 16?

They then go on to say C(t)=Co=([itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex])[itex]\frac{t}{H}[/itex] but there is no way that can be true! Can someone please explain firstly why the multiply the [itex]\frac{1}{8}[/itex] by 16 in the first place, and secondly why they equate C(t) & Co & ([itex]\frac{1}{2}[/itex])[itex]\frac{t}{H}[/itex] ??

With every half-life (H), the amount of radioactive material will half. That's the nature of exponential radioactive decay. So after one half-life, your material goes to ½ the original, after another, you go to 1/4, etc. Remember that these are fractions of radioactive material remaining.

So the fraction of the original remaining after n half-lives will be ½n. It's simple to see this is correct e.g. if n=0 (at start), the fraction is 1 (all the material remains), at n=1 (one half-life), the fraction is ½ (half remains), etc.

n is the number of half-lives, which is just the time elapsed divided by the half-life, which is (t/H).

As I mentioned above, the problem can be worked out either with mass (as they've done), or with fractions of material. The latter is actually quicker. If 1/8 of the original material remains at time t, then 3 half-lives (½3 = 1/8) have elapsed. That means t/H = 3, and hence t = 3*5730 years = 17,190 years.
 
  • #7
C0=16 grams

If you only have 1/8 for the material left at the end, then C(t) must be 2 grams.
 
  • #8
But the actual amount is irrelevant. 1/8 was left so you need to solve
[tex]\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{t/5730}= \frac{1}{8}[/tex]

8 is 2 to what power?
 
  • #9
HallsofIvy said:
But the actual amount is irrelevant. 1/8 was left so you need to solve
[tex]\left(\frac{1}{2}\right)^{t/5730}= \frac{1}{8}[/tex]

8 is 2 to what power?

I was only trying to point out to the OP what C0 and C(t) signify in his original equation. He seemed to be confused about this. Obviously, in a problem like this, the only thing that really matters is the ratio of C(t) to C0.
 

1. What is half-life and how does it relate to C-14?

Half-life is the time it takes for half of the atoms in a radioactive substance to decay. In the case of C-14, it is the time it takes for half of the initial amount of C-14 atoms to decay into stable N-14 atoms. This is a constant rate of decay and is used to determine the age of organic materials through the process of radiocarbon dating.

2. How is the half-life of C-14 calculated?

The half-life of C-14 is approximately 5,730 years. This value is determined through experimentation and observation of the rate of decay of C-14 atoms over time. It is important to note that the half-life of C-14 can vary slightly depending on environmental factors.

3. Can the half-life of C-14 be used to determine the age of any organic material?

No, the half-life of C-14 is only applicable to organic materials that were once living. This is because living organisms constantly absorb and replenish C-14 through the atmosphere, while non-living materials do not. Therefore, radiocarbon dating can only be used on materials that were once part of a living organism.

4. How accurate is the half-life of C-14 in determining the age of organic materials?

The half-life of C-14 is a very accurate method for determining the age of organic materials. However, it is important to note that other factors such as contamination and environmental conditions can affect the results. Therefore, it is important to use multiple methods of dating and to account for any potential errors or uncertainties.

5. Is the half-life of C-14 a constant value?

Yes, the half-life of C-14 is a constant value and does not change over time. This allows scientists to accurately use this method for dating organic materials, as long as certain factors such as environmental conditions and contamination are taken into consideration.

Similar threads

  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
916
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
941
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
896
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
32
Views
840
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
185
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
348
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
930
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
1K
Back
Top