Need help with lots of different types of problems

[RubyRed]

I already posted a thread about a "physics" (although I am actually in basic college algebra) but I have a few more that I need help with.

1) A jumbo chocolate bar with a rectangular shape measures 12 cm in length, 7cm in width and 3 cm in thickness. Due to escalating costs of cocoa, management decides to reduce the volume of the bar by 20%. To accomplish this reduction, management decides that the new bar should have the same 3 cm thickness but the length and width of each should be reduced an equal number of centimeters. What should the dimensions of the new candy bar be?

~Now I know that the formula for volume is lwh. So I took the original measurements 12 x 7 x 3 and got 252. I reduced that by 20% which would be 252-50.4= 201.6 to get the new volume of the reduced bar. Now I know that the thickness is going to stay the same so I think the new equation would be 201.6=lw x 3. I need to make sure that the length and width get reduced the same amount so I have to make sure that they stay 5 cm apart (if original l=12 and w=7 12-7=5cm) so I made the equation say 201.6= w+5 x w x 3 (x's are multiplication symbols by the way) but now what do I do..do I subtract 5 from both sides and make the w's w^2 and then divide both sides by 3 and square root the answer to get w? And then once I know that I can find l? I don't know what to do from here!


2)Find k such that the equation x^2 - kx +4 =0

Ok so I subtacted 4 from each side to get x^2 - kx= -4 Now I am horrible at these so I am probably way off but then I divded both sides by x...so that I had x-k = -4 over x (I don't know how to type fractions, sorry!) but I had no idea what to do from there...I am supposed to only keep a constant on the right correct? So moving x over seemed wrong to me, but with only one given number in an equation I don't know what to do.

I guess that is it for now, I have more but maybe I can do them once I know how to do these ones. Thanks guys!

 

[bob1182006]

#1 has me a bit stumped at the moment :s
but #2 you did good so far getting x-k=\frac{-4}{x} and now you just to have to continue solving for k by having k by itself on one side of the equation

 

[RubyRed]

I just realized that I didn't type the entire problem for number 2...it should say "find k such that the equation x^2-kx+4=0 has a repeated real solution." So I should move x over in which case Iwould have -k=-4-x...which would make k=4+x and that is as far as I can go right? But what about the repeated real solution part that I am supposed to find? Kinda confusing to me

 

[bob1182006]

uh repeated real solution? never heard of that sorry. Does your textbook have any mention of repeated real solution?

but in the solution k=4+x you droped the /x on the 4

 

[RubyRed]

In my textbook all it says is "When the left side factors into two linear equations with the same solution, the quadratic equation is said to have a repeated solution." It doesn't say the word real in the definition but I am assuming they are referring to a repeated solution with real numbers...still a bit confusing to me. ohh so the solution should be k= 4/x + x , can you add that together and make it k=4/2x which would just = 2x right? so is k=2x the answer?

 

[bob1182006]

ok finally i solved #1 :s so i can help you out with it:

so you know from the question that 12 and 7 will be lowered by the same amount right? so one way to solve it is to create 3 equations to solve this problem:

the original

l*w*3=201.6
l=12-x
w=7-x

so ill let you have a go at it and see if you can solve it

 

[RubyRed]

ok can you give me the next step to get started on because I am stumped...

 

[RubyRed]

wait! ok so 201.6 = (12-x)(7-x)(3) is that the right direction?

 

[bob1182006]

ooo i get that now, what they mean is like in the quadratic equation a (real) repeated solution would be when the determinant b^2-4ac=0 which would give a repeated solution, what they also want is this to be a real solution, no negative square roots.

so using the original equation you just plug in for b, a, c and solve for k

just in case you forgot the quadratic equation is in form ax^2+bx+c=0

 

[RubyRed]

so should I foil the first 2 and then multiply by 3? ugh but then how do I separate what is l and what is w?

 

[bob1182006]

yes that's the right direction, but i recommend before plugging in the value's for l and w to move the 3 to the right side to make things a bit easier, and then do foil and solve for x

 

[RubyRed]

so after foiling 201.6= 252-57x+3x^2

that doesn't seem right to me... ok I am confused again

 

[bob1182006]

try dividing both sides by 3, and then foiling, then you'll have a quadratic equation which you can solve using the quadratic formula
x=\frac{-b\pm\sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}

or you could do that now by moving the 201.6 over to the right side which would give you
3x^2-57x-50.4=0

 

[RubyRed]

so if I divide both sides by 3 I have 67.2 = (12-x)(7-x)/3 is that right so far?

 

[RubyRed]

but how do I foil it if it is all over 3?? or when I divide by 3 does it just cancel out the (3) and not affect the others. Should it be 67.2=(12-x)(7-x)

 

[bob1182006]

no, if you divided by 3 you'd just have 67.2=(12-x)(7-x)

 

[RubyRed]

ok I thought you had to divide every single thing by 3...my bad(jeepers it has been so long since I have done this!), ok so now I have 67.2=84-19x+x^2 so now I can plug it into the equation you showed me?

 

[RubyRed]

the quadratic formula I mean

 

[bob1182006]

well if you had it lw3 then it would be 3l*3w, so dividing by 3 would just leave lw or (12-x)(7-x)

edit: sorry didnt see your last posts

kz you got everything right so far, now just move the 67.2 over to the right side so its all =0 and plug a/b/c intot he quadratic formula to solve for x

 

[RubyRed]

ok I got x=12 or x=7 but those were the original 2 numbers. lol...how did i get that? I will try to show what I did. I foiled and got 67.2= 84-19x+x^2 I plugged it in and got x= -(-19) +- square root of 19^2-4(1)(84) over 2(1) (you might want to write that out to visualize it) so then I got it down to x=19+- square root of 361-336 over 2. Which = x=19 =- square root of 25 over 2, which is then x=19 +- 5 over 2. So then I did x=19-5 over 2 which is x=14 over 2 which is x=7. Then 19+5 over 2 which is x=24 over 2 which is 12...but those can't be right becuse then it would be the SAME EXACT as before I reduced it by 20%...how did that happen?

 

[bob1182006]

you forgot to move 67.2 over to the right side, the equation should be x^2-19x+16.8=0 now if you solve for x and then plug that in for the 12-x, 7-x you should get the new length/width for the candy bars

p.s. this is a thread that shows how to use the LaTeX typesetting which is what shows the equations in the way you would see them in a book or written out properly
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=8997
it's not hard to learn it and it might be useful from time to time in these forums

 

[RubyRed]

oh yeah! I see my mistake now, ok let me do this real quick...hey thanks for that URL for that...that will make it much easier!

 

[RubyRed]

so now I need to find the square root of 146.9...but that number is soooo long...do I just round it to like the hundreth or something?

 

[bob1182006]

how did you get 146.9?

and yes you would have to round the answer off

 

[RubyRed]

ok I took 0=16.8-19x+x^2 (sorry I am not using that page you showed me yet, I haven't had time to look at it) and I plugged it into the quadratic formula sooo( I probably won't do exactly step for step and SR means square root)

x= 19 +- SR -19^2 - 4(1)(16.8) over 2

x= 19 +- SR 361 - 67.2 over 2

x= 19 +- SR 293.8 over 2

and then I divided SR 293.8 by 2 and got SR 146.9. Should I have gotten the SR of 293.8 before dividing by 2 and even so that number is17. something and it is an extremely long number...which would be harder to divide by 2.

 

[bob1182006]

yes, but also its (19+-SR 293.8) over 2, i think if you're using windows there's a calculator on the start>programs>accessories that has the square root function, or you could just use a calculator to find it

 

[RubyRed]

right so when I put SR 293.8 over 2 to get rid of the 2 I divide and it ends up being 146.9...which is how I got that number that you asked me how I got it. That's right isn't it? And then I find the SR of that which is 12.12023102090055 and so on... so say I round it to 12.12 then I put 19-12.12 = 6.88 or 19+12.12 =31.12

then plug it into the l= 12-x and w=7-x I have l= 5.12 or -43.12 (which it couldn't be negative) so it must be the 5.12. And w = .12 (which seems awfully small) or w= -24.12 (which once again it is negative)...what did you get for answers?

 

[bob1182006]

no you don't divide by 2 yet

uh here's the equation with LaTeX typesetting
x=\frac{19\pm\sqrt{293.8}}{2}
if you have a calculator just type in ((sqrt 293.8) + 19) /2 for 1 of the answers, and for the second it would be (19 - (sqrt 293.8))/2, and you will notice only 1 of the answers will give you a real solution when you plug it into the (12-x) and (7-x)

 

[RubyRed]

ok so for the first one I got 18.07029 so on and so on and for the second one I got
0.929702 so on and so on...is that right?

 

[RubyRed]

all I have is the windows calculator so I don't know if it did it right.

 

[RubyRed]

there is no where to put pharentheses on the windows calc

 

[bob1182006]

yes that's right, now plug both of the numbers into the 12-x, 7-x and if you get a negative number then that's not the solution you need

 

[RubyRed]

ok! yay I almost got it. lol I can't believe you have spent so much time online helping me with something so tedious! I appreciate it so much though...now let's see if I can get it this time...

 

[bob1182006]

hehe no problem I am just watching television

 

[RubyRed]

ok so l=11.07 and w=6.07 :) When rounded

 

[bob1182006]

ok so for the first one I got 18.07029 so on and so on and for the second one I got
0.929702 so on and so on...is that right?

if you got that then how could you get 11.7 and 6.7?

 

[RubyRed]

when I take the l=12-.93 which means that l= 11.07 and the width would be 7-.93 which is the 6.7
I could already tell the 18.07 wouldn't work because it would be a negative number when subtracted from the 12 and 7.

 

[bob1182006]

ooooo hehe sorry thought you meant 11.7 not 11.07 >.< but yea that's the answer :) hehe took a while to solve it

 

[RubyRed]

GOSH it took FOREVER! But I got it! yay! haha thanks so much for your help, I am sure I will be on this forum often, so maybe I will put you through math hell and help me again sometime. lol But for now I have had ENOUGH math, ugh, thanks again. Talk to you later! G'Night

 

[bob1182006]

hehe no problem, glad i could help