I Need help with overly ambitious rocket project

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Adoniram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Project Rocket
AI Thread Summary
A group is attempting to build an ambitious rocket project aimed at achieving high altitudes over 50,000 feet, incorporating a swept-wing jet body with retractable wings for launch and return. They plan to use Arduino for trajectory control and capture high-quality video during the flight. Key engineering challenges include developing a mathematical model that accounts for non-constant mass, air pressure, density, temperature, and drag. The project will start with simpler robotic rockets to test upward flight control before scaling up to more complex designs. Legal considerations, such as FAA regulations, are acknowledged as necessary for the project's success.
Adoniram
Messages
93
Reaction score
6
Hello All, a few friends of mine and I have devised the ridiculous idea that it would be fun to build a rocket that could do something like the popular weather balloon projects which achieve high altitude for cool visuals (via GoPro or similar). But we want to make it better/faster/cooler. The objectives are:

  • Rocket is actually swept-wing jet body with retractable wings (in for launch, out for return)
  • Rocket achieves high altitude (>50,000 ft is the real goal)
  • Uses arduino or similar to maintain both launch and return trajectory
  • Flies to specified way points on return
  • Takes super cool video

Some strategic goals are:
  1. Develop actual mathematical model to explore parameter space of weight and fuel vs max altitude
  2. Make simple robotic rocket (plain vanilla Estes with D or E engines) to test and program robotics for upward flight control (point straight up, don't roll, etc)
  3. Make simple robotic rocket with retractable wings to test return control
  4. Scale up to higher altitudes, eventually use more exotic fuels, etc

I think 2 and 3 will be a fun engineering project, and 4 will be somewhat costly and monumental, but my job is to focus primarily on # 1 for now. It has been a long time since I took CM, so I could use some help... This is what I need to account for (some things are redundant):

  • a. Non-constant mass (obviously)
  • b. Non-constant air pressure/density/temperature
  • c. Drag

I've seen somewhat decently developed EOM for a or c, but never together. Incorporating b should really be something included with c.

If you know of any really well developed models for this, that include all 3, I would really appreciate it! The best I've seen so far, which only has one of those requirements, are here:
http://www.rocketmime.com/rockets/rckt_eqn.html#Method
and here:
http://web.mit.edu/16.unified/www/FALL/thermodynamics/notes/node103.html

Thanks!

ps: yes I know this will require legal hurdles as well, FAA rules, ITAR, etc...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only reliable advice you're going to get from the anonymous posters on an internet forum is: Find people who know what they're doing and work with them. Good starting points will be http://www.tripoli.org/ and http://www.nar.org/.

I'm closing this this thread because it's really not something that we can provide actionable advice on, but if anyone wants to suggest other reliable reosurces, please PM me or any of the other mentors so we can add on to this answer.
 
  • Like
Likes CWatters
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top