Why Does Adding Mass to the Ends of a Chain Affect Its Slipping Time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter no_brainer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
Adding mass to the ends of a chain on a frictionless table increases the total gravitational force acting on the chain, thereby affecting its slipping time. When the chain is released, the gravitational force on the hanging portion causes it to accelerate, leading to a quicker slip off the table when additional mass is added. The discussion raises questions about the initial conditions for releasing the chain and the role of equilibrium in the absence of friction. It is suggested that the forces involved, particularly gravity, are crucial to understanding why T1 is less than T2. Overall, the addition of mass alters the dynamics of the system, resulting in a longer slipping time.
no_brainer
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. A chain of mass m is on a frictionlesss table, half of the chain is hanging over the table's edge. We let the chain go and after time T1, the chains slips off the table. We repeat this experiment but this time we add two identical objects(each of mass M) at each end of the chain. After time T2 the chains slips off the table.

How would I show that T1 <T2?

The thing I don't get is how did we let the chain go in the first place..was it with a force that we exert on it or what? Also I think that the chain was in equilibrium that's why its not going anywhere..since there is no friction. Why would T2 be less..I think that it should be equal becuase since there is no friction..

What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you figure out the forces involved.

You might want to look at the situation when only 1/4 of the chain is left on the table.
 
well, from what I see, (and know, I'm just a begginer), you have gravity acting on half of the chain, the part hanging over the table, and with no friction, there is no opposing force keeping it from sliding off the table.

so this is kinda what it looks like;


000000
0
0
0
0
You have gravity pulling down creating a force, from there, you can take it, I just woke up ;)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top