Need help with summation sequence.

Demonoid
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
I'm a little stuck here...

I need to write this in the summation notation, and then find and prove a formula in terms of n, using induction :3+7+11+...+(4n-1)

I know that the summation notation is
n
+---
\
/ 4i-1
+---
i=1

but I have no idea how to actually find the formula for the sum and then prove it.

3+7=10
3+7+11=21
3+7+11+15 =36
3+7+11+15+19 =55

I don't see a pattern in the summation, so I can't figure it out.Any help will be greatly appreciated !
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This is an arithmetic sequence, you should know a formula. If not it should be easy to split the terms into two sums, each having easy formulas.
 
Jarle said:
This is an arithmetic sequence, you should know a formula. If not it should be easy to split the terms into two sums, each having easy formulas.

a little bit more explanation with sample solution will be helpful. What you said doesn't help a bit. I know that it is an arithmetic formula (4n-1). The sum on the other hand is not.
 
Jarle said:
This is an arithmetic sequence, you should know a formula. If not it should be easy to split the terms into two sums, each having easy formulas.

First look at the sum from 1 to n of 4i.

This is:

4 + 8 + 12 + 16 + 20 + ... + 4n

Now, notice how the sum of the 1st and the n-th terms is 4+4n = 4*(n+1).
Notice how the sum of the 2nd and the (n-1)-th terms is 8+4*(n-1) = 4*(n+1)
Notice how the sum of the 3rd and the (n-2)-th terms is 4*(n+1)
Notice how the sum of the 4th and the (n-3)-th terms is 4*(n+1)

If n is even, then the you can see how the above sum must be (n/2)*4*(n+1).

This equals 2*n*(n+1). We can see, however, that this actually works for all n, even or odd, in the following way:

If n=1, then 2*n*(n+1) = 4, which is correct. Now, let n=k, where k is some integer. Consider what happens when when change from n=k to n=k+1. Then the above expression goes from 2*k*(k+1) to 2*(k+1)*(k+2). But notice, this second expression is exactly 4*(k+1) more.

In other words, [2*(k+1)*(k+2)] - [2*k*(k+1)] = 4*(k+1). But 4*(k+1) is exactly the amount we add when we go from n=k to n=k+1. Thus the expression 2*n*(n+1) must be correct for any n.

This type of sum is called an arithmetic sum. The sum from i=1 to n of i equals n*(n+1)/2. This is something you should remember, or else remember how to derive. Once you know this, it is easy to find an expression for any other arithmetic sum. For example, the sum from 1 to n of a*i - b will simply equal a*(n*(n+1)/2) - n*b. But you should not memorize this. You should memorize the manipulations you are allowed to do with series and sequences.

The sum from 1 to n of a*f(i), where f is a function of i, and 'a' is a constant, will always equal 'a' times the sum from 1 to n of f(i).

The sum from 1 to n of f(i) + g(i), where f and g are a functions of i, will always equal [the sum from 1 to n of g(i)] plus [the sum from 1 to n of f(i)].

Specifically, the sum from 1 to n of f(i) + b, where f is a functions of i, and 'b' is a constant, will always equal n*b plus the sum from 1 to n of f(i).
 
Last edited:
Demonoid said:
a little bit more explanation with sample solution will be helpful. What you said doesn't help a bit. I know that it is an arithmetic formula (4n-1). The sum on the other hand is not.

What I meant was that you probably have learned a formula for summing an arithmetic sequence. Do you know the formula for the sum \sum_{k=1}^n k ? If so, split the sum as this: \sum_{k=1}^n 4k-1= 4\sum_{k=1}^n k+-\sum_{k=1}^n 1.

\sum_{k=1}^n k = \frac{k(k-1)}{2} by the way. You probably should show that by induction if this will be the means of your proof.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top