Need to find the Ricci scalar curvature of this metric

chinared
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Need to find the Ricci scalar curvature of this metric:
ds2 = e2a(z)(dx2 + dy2) + dz2 − e2b(z)dt2

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to find the solution, but failed to pass the calculation of Riemann curvature tensor:

<The Christoffel connection> Here a'(z) denotes the first derivative of a(z) respect to z.
\Gamma\stackrel{x}{xz}=\Gamma\stackrel{x}{zx}=a'(z)
\Gamma\stackrel{y}{yz}=\Gamma\stackrel{y}{zy}=a'(z)
\Gamma\stackrel{z}{tt}=b'(z)e2b(z)
\Gamma\stackrel{z}{xx}=\Gamma\stackrel{z}{yy}=-a'(z)e2a(z)
\Gamma\stackrel{t}{tz}=\Gamma\stackrel{t}{zt}=b'(z)
\Gamma\stackrel{}{either}=0

<The Riemann curvature tensor>
\R\stackrel{x}{zxz}=\R\stackrel{y}{zyz}=-a''(z)-[a'(z)]2
\R\stackrel{z}{tzt}=b''(z)+[b'(z)]2

I tried to find the Ricci scalar curvature(R) from current result, but it gave a function depend on z. Is there any problem in my calculation?

Thanks for answering this question~!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chinared said:
I tried to find the Ricci scalar curvature(R) from current result, but it gave a function depend on z. Is there any problem in my calculation?

Why wouldn't it depend on z when your metric does. You can compare this to the FRW-metric. In that case, the metric and the scalar curvature depend on time.

The results look reasonable but I'm a bit too lazy to check it explicitly.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top