Need verify on a momment of inertia/torque problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter iamtrojan3
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a high school student's struggle with a moment of inertia and torque problem involving a solid disc. The student calculates the moment of inertia as 0.1331 kg·m² and the torque as 8.25 Nm, leading to an angular acceleration of 62 rad/s². However, the student expresses doubt about the final angular velocity calculation of 48.35 rad/s after three rotations. Forum members confirm the approach is correct but emphasize the importance of including units in calculations for clarity and accuracy. Overall, the student seeks validation and guidance on their physics homework problem.
iamtrojan3
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hi, this is my first time on this forum, so don't flame me for not doing things right. I'm a junior in high school and currently taking AP physics, this problem in my hwk has been bothering me for a while. I've never received the answer to this question and i just need to know if i did this right, since this is really the first moment of inertia problem i encountered...
the problem is:
A force of 15N is applied tangentially to the edge of a 0.88kg solid disc initially at rest. The radius of the disc is 0.55m. How fast will the disc be spinning after it has gone 3.0 complete rotations? (disregard all the friction/air resistance etc.)

The moment of Inertia of a solid disc is I=1/2mr^2 >> I=1/2(0.88)(0.55^2) >> I=0.1331
Torque= Lever arm x Force applied Torque= 15N x 0.55m = 8.25Nm
Torque = alpha x I >>> 8.25= alpha x 0.1331 >>> alpha = 62 (this doesn't look right :cry: )
Then just use Kenematic Equations
since 3 rotations is 6pi
W^2=Wo^2x2(alpha)(Theta)
W^2=0(62)(6pi)>>> W= 48.35radians/sec (this doesn't look right either :mad: :cry: )

Basicly my thoughts through the problem ^^^^^^^^^
Feel free to correct me on watever...i admitt, i suck/hate these problems.
Thanks :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have not verified your numbers, but the approach is correct.

I will suggest that you make it a habit to carry the units along in your calculations. Properly used, units can be a real aid in arriving at the correct solution.


Note: I have moved this post to the homework help section. In the future please post such problems here... Welcome to Physics fourms.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top