Negative support reaction? (Statics)

AI Thread Summary
In statics, support reactions can indeed be negative, indicating that the force is acting in the opposite direction than expected, such as downward instead of upward. This situation can arise in systems with specific constraints, such as a beam supported in a way that allows for horizontal movement while restricting vertical movement. The presence of a negative reaction force suggests that the beam may be experiencing an external load or moment that causes it to rotate around the support with the positive reaction. Understanding the direction of forces is crucial for accurately analyzing static equilibrium. Therefore, negative support reactions are valid and reflect the actual behavior of the system under certain loading conditions.
asucho3
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Sorry for not using the template, but this question I have is not very complicated (or I hope so).
I was creating a couple of problems with beams (Statics) and I came up with one where one of the support reactions has a negative value. The beam has 2 supports, one of them restricts all possible movements, and the other one allows movement only on the X axis (horizontal movement).
Now, I'm not sure if that is possible, since (I think) that would make the system rotate around the support with the positive reaction.
So, my question is, if it is possible for reaction forces to be negative.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure 'negative force' makes a whole lot of sense, but 'force acting in the other direction' does. Perhaps that's what's coming up here?
 
Yes, what I meant is if support reactions can go downwards instead of upwards, sorry I wasn't clear
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

How Do Support Reactions Affect 2D Static Equilibrium in a Shopping Cart?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Statically Indeterminate Truck - Finding reaction forces at supports
Replies
8
Views
2K
Calculating Forces in a Leg: Gait Analysis and Joint Reaction Force
Replies
7
Views
1K
Reaction Forces on a Frame With Roller Joint and Pin Joint
Replies
7
Views
9K
Statics: Statically Indeterminate Unstable Plane Truss
Replies
4
Views
5K
I Negative Q-value for 7Li(alpha,n) reaction
Replies
18
Views
4K
3D Equillibrium Statics Problem - Reaction Forces/Moments
Replies
4
Views
2K
Equilibrium in 2D: Finding Tension and Support Reactions in a Cable System
Replies
12
Views
2K
Engineering Instantaneous Center of Rotation (Polplan in german) and STATICS
Replies
1
Views
1K
Moment in different dimensions in 2 D
Replies
4
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top