Neighborhood Proof for Distinct Points in a Metric Space

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tokipin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Tokipin
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



From Introduction to Topology by Bert Mendelson, Chapter 2.4, Exercise 6:

Let a and b be distinct points of a metric space X. Prove that there are neighborhoods N_a and N_b of a and b respectively such that N_a \cap N_b = \varnothing.

2. The attempt at a solution

OK, intuitively I recognize at least two cases: 1) If both points are "separate" such that for a and b, their smallest neighborhoods are \{a\} and \{b\} respectively, then these neighborhoods obviously don't intersect.

2) If at least one of the points has an "infinitely partitionable neighborhood" such that for any open ball of radius r about the point we can find another open ball of radius r-\epsilon about the same point which is a strict subset of the first ball, then we can find a \delta such that the open ball of radius \delta about that point does not include a neighborhood of the other point.

Where I think I'm getting confused is whether these are the only two scenarios that can occur in a metric space (both points separate, or one or both possessing "infinitely partitionable neighborhoods.")

I was trying to find a contradiction that might arise due to the symmetry of the distance function, but I can't find one. I might also be thinking too much into it, so overall I'm quite confused.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think all you need to do is define your neighborhood so all points within it are less then half the distance between the two points.
 
That's hilarious. I was thinking that if we define an open ball of radius d(a,b)/2 about each point, then the neighborhoods wouldn't intersect. But I wasn't sure I could generalize this from R^2. Thanks.

Here's an attempt at a proof:

About each point a and b, define an open ball of radius d(a,b)/2. If there was a point p which was in both of the open balls, then this would mean that both of the following would be true:

d(a,p) < d(a,b)/2
d(b,p) < d(a,b)/2

This would contradict the triangle inequality of a metric space:

d(a,b) \leq d(a,p) + d(p,b)

Since each term on the right would be less than d(a,b) / 2 and hence their sum would be less than the term on the left.
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
Back
Top