Net Force on a Spinning Ball Attached to a String Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the net force acting on a spinning ball attached to a string, particularly in a scenario like tetherball. Participants clarify that there is no separate centripetal force; instead, the net force is the combination of tension in the string and gravitational force. The net force can be considered centripetal only when the ball moves in a horizontal circle without vertical acceleration. Confusion arises from the terminology surrounding centripetal force, which implies a distinct force rather than a result of existing forces. Overall, understanding the relationship between tension, gravity, and motion is key to grasping the concept.
D.Strauss
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I have a conceptual question about the net force of a rotating or spinning ball attached to a string. If we have a situation such as a tether-ball game where the ball is being swung around a string at an angle to the vertical, is the net force the tension in the string, or the component of the tension that acts as the centripetal force? To me personally it seems that the net force should be the centripetal force as this is what is causing the balls acceleration, but then again the only force that can act on the ball (aside from gravity) is through the string.

Any help in clearing this up is greatly appreciated, thanks in advance for any answers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi D.Strauss! Welcome to PF! :smile:
D.Strauss said:
… is the net force the tension in the string, or the component of the tension that acts as the centripetal force? To me personally it seems that the net force should be the centripetal force as this is what is causing the balls acceleration, but then again the only force that can act on the ball (aside from gravity) is through the string.

This is why I personally think that nobody should ever mention centripetal force … it's confusing. :redface:

There is no separate centripetal force … there's only two forces: tension and gravity.​

By definition, centripetal force must be towards the centre, and as you say, that's horizontal.

The net force is the tension plus gravity, and in equilibrium (but not if the ball is rising or falling), that is horizontal.

So in equilibrium, the net force is centripetal, and otherwise it isn't.​
 
Thank you for the welcome and quick reply. :)

I agree with your opinion on the topic, not only is it confusing, it's also pretty rare to find good explanations.
Thank you for clearing this up though, like you said we can only take into account tension and gravity, so the net force must be the sum of the two, which in this case is the centripetal force, right?
I think a lot of the confusion comes from the fact that the name centripetal force suggests a separate force which, as you said, it isn't.
 
D.Strauss said:
only take into account tension and gravity, so the net force must be the sum of the two, which in this case is the centripetal force, right?
Only if there is no vertical component of velocity (or acceleration). The ball would have to move in a circle of constant radius along a horizontal plane.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
840
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
3K
Back
Top