Net force on an object and its motion....

AI Thread Summary
The statement that every object continues in a state of rest or uniform speed in a straight line due to zero net force is correct and aligns with Newton's first law. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity on whether the focus is solely on the law itself or its implications. In one-dimensional scenarios, the statement holds true, but for extended bodies, the potential for torque must be considered when zero net force is applied. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurately applying Newton's principles in various contexts. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of context in interpreting the effects of net force on motion.
jamiebean
Messages
55
Reaction score
3
Every object continues in a state of rest or of uniform speed in a straight line by zero net force.

is this statement correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you trying to reformulate Newton's first law?
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
jamiebean said:
Every object continues in a state of rest or of uniform speed in a straight line by zero net force.

is this statement correct?
yes. but as Kuruman asked, what is the real question or did you just want to state an equivilance to Newtons first law?
 
jamiebean said:
Every object continues in a state of rest or of uniform speed in a straight line by zero net force.

is this statement correct?
If it's a one dimensional point. Otherwise if it's an extended body you have to consider if the zero net force produces a torque.
 

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

B Zero acceleration = zero net force?
Replies
33
Views
2K
I If there is no force being applied can there still be a net force?
Replies
18
Views
2K
I How is the net force on the system equal to 0 initially?
Replies
14
Views
1K
I Understanding Net Internal Torque and Kinetic Friction in a System
Replies
9
Views
2K
B Newton's first law?
Replies
37
Views
497
B Confusion while trying to build intuition of centripetal force
Replies
15
Views
3K
Work-KE theorem and net force....
Replies
33
Views
3K
Are Net Forces Greater When Both Objects A and B Are in Motion During Collision?
Replies
5
Views
2K
B Static friction needed for rolling without slipping
Replies
4
Views
2K
Constant Circular Motion Not Really Constant
Replies
20
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top