Net magnetic field caused by current from two wires

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the net magnetic field at point P due to two parallel wires carrying currents in opposite directions. The magnetic field from wire 1 points to the top right, while wire 2's field points to the bottom right, leading to a cancellation of their y-components. The net magnetic field was calculated as 4.62 x 10^-6 T, directed to the right, but there were suggestions to clarify the angle calculations and the use of R in the equations. Participants emphasized the importance of understanding the geometry of magnetic fields and the correct application of angles in these calculations. The conversation highlights the need for careful consideration of angles and components when analyzing magnetic fields from multiple sources.
mm2424
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The attached figure shows, in cross section, two long parallel wires that are separated by distance d = 18.6 cm. Each carries 4.34 A, out of the page in wire 1 and into the page in wire 2. In unit-vector notation, what is the net magnetic field at point P at distance R = 34.2 cm, due to the two currents?

Homework Equations



B = iμo/2∏R

The Attempt at a Solution



(1) The magnetic field lines around wire have a counterclockwise direction. The magnetic field lines around wire 2 have a clockwise direction. When the field lines hit point P, those from wire 1 point to the top right while those from wire 2 point to the bottom right.

(2) Angle a in the diagram is equal to the tan^-1 of 9.3/34.2. Therefore, it = 15.21. This is also the measure of the angle (measured from the x axis) of the tangent of the magnetic field lines at P from both wire 1 and wire 2.

(3) Bnet = 2[iμo/2∏R] = 4.79 x 10^-6 T.

(4) However, only the x components of the magnetic fields survive and add. The y components cancel. Therefore, we must multiply the Bnet by cos(15.21), which yields 4.62 x 10^-6 T.

(5) Because the total net field points to the right, the answer is (4.62 x 10^-6 T)(i hat)

Is this right? I can't find the answer to this question anywhere. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • Chapter29 problem.jpg
    Chapter29 problem.jpg
    4.8 KB · Views: 1,381
Physics news on Phys.org
You mostly have the right idea, but I found two problems.
mm2424 said:
(2) Angle a in the diagram is equal to the tan^-1 of 9.3/34.2. Therefore, it = 15.21. This is also the measure of the angle (measured from the x axis) of the tangent of the magnetic field lines at P from both wire 1 and wire 2.
You're correct about angle a, but think more carefully about what angle B makes. It might help to think about a point P2 that is much farther away, where the angle a2 would be very small.

(3) Bnet = 2[iμo/2∏R] = 4.79 x 10^-6 T.
I get something different, but not far off from what you get for Bnet. What are you using for R? You should include a calculation of R in your work.

Also it's really not proper to call this Bnet, which would include the cos(15.21) factor you do later on. I recommend not including the factor of 2, and call this a calculation of B due to one wire.

(4) However, only the x components of the magnetic fields survive and add. The y components cancel. Therefore, we must multiply the Bnet by cos(15.21), which yields 4.62 x 10^-6 T.

(5) Because the total net field points to the right, the answer is (4.62 x 10^-6 T)(i hat)

Is this right? I can't find the answer to this question anywhere. Thanks!
Mostly right, just rethink about the angle for B, and show your calculation of R.
 
Thanks! Is there a method for figuring out the angle B makes? I was fine when it came to finding the correct angles in kinematics, but I consistently choose the wrong angle in magnetism questions. There might be some geometry rule I've forgotten or something.
 
The method at play is the basic geometry rules concerning angle measures. Also, realizing that a magnetic field line forms a circle with the wire at the center. That means B (due to wire 1) at point P is at a right angle to the red line in your figure.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top