Net Work Done by an Accelerating Brick

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the net work done on a 12 kg brick moving along an x-axis with a non-constant acceleration. Participants clarify that since acceleration varies, the formula W = Fd cannot be applied directly, and instead, integration must be used to find work as a function of force. The acceleration is determined to be a linear function of position, leading to the derivation of force using Newton's second law. The final calculations yield a work value of approximately 405.6 Joules, confirming the correct application of the integration method for this scenario. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately deriving force from the acceleration function for proper work calculation.
emmy
Messages
36
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 12 kg brick moves along an x axis. Its acceleration as a function of its position is shown in Fig. 7-37. What is the net work performed on the brick by the force causing the acceleration as the brick moves from x = 0 to x = 5.2 m?
http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs4957/art/qb/qu/c07/fig07_37.gif


Homework Equations


W=integral from xo to x Fxdx + integral yo to y Fydy...

The Attempt at a Solution



Since acceleration isn't constant we can't use W=Fd, so:
Statement of known values:
xo= 0 m
x=5.2 m
m=12 kg
a(5.2)=13 ms-2 (from the graph.. determined by 4m/10ms-2=5.2m/x)
-----------------------
Unknown/want to find:
Wnet


So using the integral formula (can we assume it's only moving in the x direction?)

W=[integral]F(x)Δx

I'm at a loss though, in the example done in class, he broke the forces up into components, but I can't really do that here since acceleration isn't constant and force is what I'm solving for...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"A 12 kg brick moves along an x axis". So it's one dimensional motion and you won't need components.

You may not be able to use w = f*d, but you can always integrate dw = f dot dx.

The acceleration graph appears to be a straight line, so you should be able to write an equation for the force as a function of x without too much difficulty.
 
gneill said:
"A 12 kg brick moves along an x axis". So it's one dimensional motion and you won't need components.

You may not be able to use w = f*d, but you can always integrate dw = f dot dx.

The acceleration graph appears to be a straight line, so you should be able to write an equation for the force as a function of x without too much difficulty.

I'm rather uncertain on how to use the dot product formula correctly for work, but here's a shot:

From the graph, a(x)=2x/5
v(x)=x2/5
s(x)=x3/15

so then the formula to find work done is
W=integral xo to x of x3/15 dx ?

So W= x4/60 - xo4/60
W= (5.2)4/60 - (0)4/60
W=12.19 Joules?
 
You'll want to check the formula you got for the acceleration versus x. If you plug in x=4 you should get a = 10 m/s2.

With the acceleration a(x), you can write the expression for the force by using Newton's second law (f = m*a). That force is what you'll integrate from x = 0 to x = 5.2m.

W = \int_0^{5.2m} f(x) \cdot dx
 
gneill said:
You'll want to check the formula you got for the acceleration versus x. If you plug in x=4 you should get a = 10 m/s2.

With the acceleration a(x), you can write the expression for the force by using Newton's second law (f = m*a). That force is what you'll integrate from x = 0 to x = 5.2m.

W = \int_0^{5.2m} f(x) \cdot dx


I don't think I follow why you chose x=4meters, but if you do that and use Newton's second law,

F=(12kg)(10ms-2)=120N

So W = \int_0^{5.2m} 120 \cdot dx

W= 120x-120xo= 120(5.2)-120(0)= 624 Joules ?
 
No no no. The point is to get acceleration as a FUNCTION of x: a(x). Then, from that you can get force as a function of x: F(x). Then you can integrate the function F(x) to get the total work done. The force is NOT constant.

gneill was just saying that you should plug in a test value (for EXAMPLE x = 4) to check and see if your a(x) is correct.
 
cepheid said:
No no no. The point is to get acceleration as a FUNCTION of x: a(x). Then, from that you can get force as a function of x: F(x). Then you can integrate the function F(x) to get the total work done. The force is NOT constant.

gneill was just saying that you should plug in a test value (for EXAMPLE x = 4) to check and see if your a(x) is correct.

Ohhh, so I would use the equation of the line from the graph of acceleration vs displacement

a(x)=(5/2)x
(to test) a(x)=(5/2)(4)=10

F(x)=ma(x)=(12kg)(2.5)(x)= 30x

W = \int_0^{5.2m} f(x) \cdot dx =W = \int_0^{5.2m} 30x \cdot dx

W=15x2-15xo2 =15(5.2)2-30(0)=405.6 Joules
 
Last edited:
emmy said:
Ohhh, so I would use the equation of the line from the graph of acceleration vs displacement

a(x)=(5/2)x
(to test) a(x)=(5/2)(4)=10

F(x)=ma(x)=(12kg)(2.5)(x)= 30x

W = \int_0^{5.2m} f(x) \cdot dx =W = \int_0^{5.2m} 30x \cdot dx

W=15x2-15xo2 =15(5.2)2-30(0)=405.6 Joules

Yeah, that looks much better.
 
cepheid said:
Yeah, that looks much better.

Amazing! Thank you both very much! The dot product for work makes a ton and a half more sense now :biggrin:
 
Back
Top