Netforce of spring, hookes law. help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the net upward force and acceleration of a person using a pogo stick with a spring. The spring's force constant is 1.4 x 10^4 N/m, and the enthusiast compresses it from 46 cm to 5 cm. Initial calculations yielded a net upward force of 5152 N, which was debated due to significant figures, with some arguing the correct answer should be 5100 N. The second part of the problem, concerning acceleration, was challenging for participants, with the book providing an answer of 85 m/s² and 8.7 gs. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of significant figures in physics calculations and the need for clarity in problem-solving approaches.
jim gerth
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An "extreme" pogo stick utilizies a spring whose uncompressed length is 46 cm and whose force constant is 1.4 x 10^4 N/m (14000). A 60 kg enthusiast is jumping on the pogo stick, compressing the spring to a length of only 5.0 cm at the bottom of her jump, Calculate; a) The net upward force on her at the moment the spring reaches its greatest compression and b) her upward acceleration in m/s^2 and gs at that moment.

Any thoughts?
Thanks.

Homework Equations



F=-kx F=ma w=mg

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok so i started with multiplying the force constant and difference of distance . 14000 x (0.46 - 0.05) = 5740 then i subtracted the weight which is (60)(9.8)= 588 which gave me an answer of 5152. The answer in the book says 5100. I know with having 2 sig figs you could say it was 5100 but i am not sure if i went about this right.. and also don't know where to go with b especially if i did not get a correct.??

thanks everyone.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Having 2 significant figures with your final result does NOT give 5100. It gives 5200.

##
\vec{F}_{net} = \vec{F}_{spring} + \vec{F}_{person}
##
Both of which you stated the formulas for.
If you round both of your results with respect to the amount of significant figures before subtracting, you get 5100 ( after significant figures are applied to this as well, beforehand it is 5110)
That's the only thing "wrong" I see.

Your analysis was correct, however. What are your thoughts on the second portion (the acceleration)?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the reply and clarification, Yeah sorry , i meant to say 5200.. and i have no idea how to approach the acceleration , we have yet to learn that. I've been checking everywhere on how to approach it but i don't even know where to start lol -____- answers in the back is 85 m/s^2 and 8.7 gs. i wish i could say my answers were even close .
 
lol i thought it was more than just that but nvm i got it . Thanks again
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top