Can Neutral Particles be Accelerated by Polarization and External Fields?

AI Thread Summary
Neutral elementary particles cannot be practically accelerated due to their lack of charge, making traditional acceleration methods ineffective. Current techniques involve neutral beam injection, where ions are accelerated and then neutralized, but this pertains to neutral atoms rather than elementary particles. Neutrons can be produced through high-energy collisions or nuclear reactions, but these methods are not efficient for acceleration. Theoretical approaches suggest that polarized neutral molecules and atoms could be influenced by external electric and magnetic fields, yet these remain largely untested. The discussion raises questions about the purpose and feasibility of accelerating neutral particles, indicating a need for further exploration in this area.
spacetime
Messages
119
Reaction score
2
How are neutral elementary particles accelerated? Is it actually practical as of yet, or is there a way we can do so in the future?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The two ways that I've run across are to accelerate negatively ionized hydrogen atoms and then pass them through rarified gas to strip off the extra electrons, or to accelerate a proton beam and add electrons when it's up to speed. I don't know how widespread or even practical they are. (Or are those particles less 'elementary' than you meant?)
 
The process described by Danger is the basis of 'neutral beam' injection, which is the process of accelerating ions to some energy then neutralizing them - but that is a neutral atom - not an elementary particle.

Basically, one does not accelerate a neutral particle.

Neutrons can be ejected from nuclei, either by interaction with a gamma photon of sufficient energy, or by bombardment with a proton, deuteron, alpha particle or other particle. The heavier the projectile particle (which also means increased nuclear charge, Z), the more energy input is required to assure a nuclear reaction, and this would become generally impractical for obtaining neutrons. The D+T fusion reaction produces neutrons of 14.1 MeV.

High energy collisions of particles can be used to produce neutral particles, but they will also produce charged particles as well.

Annihilation of particles e+e- and p\bar{p} can also produce energetic neutral particles, as well as charge particles.
 
Last edited:
sure,

to acceleratee neutral elemental particulares is almost unresolved problem. However there is THEORETICAL (not practical) posibilities to accelerate neutral molecules and atoms. Idea is the next. Neutral molecules and atoms are polarized in external electric field. In external magnetic field there is Lorentz force, which influence on moving charges. This is the way how to transform "electric energy" into kinetic (please see attachment). Sure, if direction of current (moving of charges) is changing, directiion of magnetic field is changing also.
Probably, we can use orthogonal laser beems as sources of magnetic and electric fields.

But I don't understand, what task to accelerate neutral particules, molecules, atoms or even neutrons?
 

Attachments

  • neutral accelerator.JPG
    neutral accelerator.JPG
    22.5 KB · Views: 840
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top