Neutrinos: Mass, Right & Left-Handed | Wang Yi

  • Thread starter Thread starter wangyi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Neutrinos
wangyi
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hi,
If neutrinos have mass, can "right-handed" and a "left-handed" change
to each other? Why we can only find left-handed ones?

Thank you.
Wang Yi
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hold on,the antineutrinos are very well "right-handed".I think it's safe to say that explaining preferential chirality of neutrinos (& their antiparticles) is still an enigma within the SM of particles & interactions.

Daniel.
 
It is true that a LT can change the helicity of a neutrino with mass (which is usually negative) to positive. The designation LH or RH for particles is used to describe their weak interaction [(V-A) or (V+A)]. In this sense, even a neutrino with mass is LH. The handedness of leptons and quarks is built into the group structure of the Standard Model.
 
I see. Thank you.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top