New catalyst may impact energy storage (MIT, electrolysis)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a new catalyst developed by Dan Nocera that enables the electrolysis of pH neutral water, a significant advancement over traditional methods that require alkaline solutions. While the potential applications of this technology are promising, particularly for home use and integration with renewable energy sources like wind and solar, there are concerns about the lack of efficiency data and commercialization efforts. Participants express frustration over the gap between scientific breakthroughs and practical engineering applications, emphasizing that real-world implementation is complex and not straightforward. The conversation also touches on the broader field of artificial photosynthesis and various approaches being explored to produce hydrogen from water, indicating a long-term commitment to finding viable solutions in this area.
marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,753
Reaction score
794
this EurekAlert page links to a MIT press release describing the operation of the new catalyst and potential applications

http://search.eurekalert.org/e3/query.html?qt=Nocera&col=ev3rel&qc=ev3rel&x=12&y=16

Dan Nocera is the main person responsible. Here's a ScienceDaily account
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080731143345.htm

I can't tell how important this development really is. It allows the electrolysis of pH neutral water, apparently. Usual electrolysis requires an alkaline solution, apparently. I don't see any figures about efficiency. It seems to me that it could be important but I can't be sure. Any thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
marcus said:
this EurekAlert page links to a MIT press release describing the operation of the new catalyst and potential applications

http://search.eurekalert.org/e3/query.html?qt=Nocera&col=ev3rel&qc=ev3rel&x=12&y=16

Dan Nocera is the main person responsible. Here's a ScienceDaily account
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080731143345.htm

I can't tell how important this development really is. It allows the electrolysis of pH neutral water, apparently. Usual electrolysis requires an alkaline solution, apparently. I don't see any figures about efficiency. It seems to me that it could be important but I can't be sure. Any thoughts?




This is very interesting . The catalyst should work with an efficiency comparable to that of the platinum catalyst with respect to solid surface phenomena . Old tricks for electrolysis required a charged solution so to make electron transfer throughout the solution more feasible . Could the future of the US be that every household are equipped with these devices ?
 
I don't know why someone isn't busy commercializing this. I see so many windmills that are idled most of the day and night. They could be charging fuel cells. Solar facilities could also be using the technology charging fuel cells for night time use.

Hopefully, the technology could be scaled down for home use charging fuel cells in cars.

Why do we have so much brilliant science and no engineering to make it work for us.
 
FrankD said:
I don't know why someone isn't busy commercializing this. I see so many windmills that are idled most of the day and night. They could be charging fuel cells. Solar facilities could also be using the technology charging fuel cells for night time use.

Hopefully, the technology could be scaled down for home use charging fuel cells in cars.

Why do we have so much brilliant science and no engineering to make it work for us.

You can't just take a concept that someone created in a lab under perfect ideal conditions and then instantly apply it to the real world. Technology just doesn't work that way. It should also be noted that a lot of modern technologies and techniques already commercially available can reach very comparable efficiencies and reach those efficiencies at high pressures (this is a really big deal). FYI, you can't charge a fuel cell. It's not a battery or energy storage device, its an engine.
 
Well, a lot of people are working on artificial photosynthesis, typically with the goal of producing hydrogen from water, is a huge field.
It's being attacked from every conceivable angle.

For instance, the EU's http://www.fotomol.uu.se/Forskning/Biomimetics/solarh2/overview.shtm" and Solar-H2 programs. Which is very ambitious and oriented at a biomimetic type catalyst.

There are others working more on purely organometallic catalysts.
And our group had a guy doing some theoretical studies on this stuff.

It's going to happen in the long term, that's for sure. I don't think anyone knows which approach is going to be most successful.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!

Similar threads

Back
Top