New Homo Sapiens timeline findings

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1oldman2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    homo
AI Thread Summary
Recent discussions highlight a significant shift in the timeline for Homo sapiens, now estimated to have emerged around 300,000 years ago instead of the previously accepted 200,000 years. This extension suggests that humans had an additional 100,000 years to develop their evolutionary traits without significant improvement. Participants express fascination with ongoing discoveries about human history, emphasizing the role of advanced technologies in uncovering these insights. The investigation of mitochondrial DNA is particularly noted for its potential to clarify human migration patterns, including the complexities surrounding the settlement of the Americas. The conversation reflects a broader interest in how new findings may lead to major revisions in our understanding of human evolution and migration.
Biology news on Phys.org
Amazing how we keep finding out more and more about our history, it's like the never ending story. :approve:
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
fresh_42 said:
Yes, these are bad news. 300,000 years instead of 200,000. This means we had even an entire half more time to not improve on our wild evolutionary habits.
Agreed, I always thought as an analogy, "If genetics were a deck of cards there would be a lot of extra jokers in the deck"
 
Evo said:
Amazing how we keep finding out more and more about our history, it's like the never ending story. :approve:
I'm particularly pleased with the new technologies being developed in these fields, at this rate it really is a never ending story. :cool:
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42 and Evo
1oldman2 said:
I'm particularly pleased with the new technologies being developed in these fields, at this rate it really is a never ending story. :cool:
I find especially interesting the investigations of mitochondrial DNA to reconstruct our migrations. Let alone these are far from being known. IIRC even the settlement of the Americas isn't finally known. Somehow funny that we know more about how we managed to reach Polynesia, which by the way is an enormous achievement, than we actually know how many migrations waves and whether along both coasts or only along the pacific coast took place to reach Fireland.
 
  • Like
Likes 1oldman2
fresh_42 said:
I find especially interesting the investigations of mitochondrial DNA to reconstruct our migrations. Let alone these are far from being known. IIRC even the settlement of the Americas isn't finally known. Somehow funny that we know more about how we managed to reach Polynesia, which by the way is an enormous achievement, than we actually know how many migrations waves and whether along both coasts or only along the pacific coast took place to reach Fireland.
Although this one has been a little controversial, it still boggles my imagination. A major rewrite if its proven correct.
https://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v544/n7651/full/nature22065.html
 
  • Like
Likes fresh_42
Back
Top