New logic optimization algoritm

AI Thread Summary
A new logic optimization algorithm is proposed, aimed at improving upon existing methods like the Quine–McCluskey algorithm and Espresso heuristic logic minimizer, specifically for multi-level representations and optimal circuit design for 8 to 12 input bits. The discussion highlights the importance of considering factors such as fanout, gate size, delay, and power consumption in modern logic optimization. While the proposed algorithm may have limitations due to its input bit range, there is potential for practical applications if it proves effective. The trend in the industry is shifting towards physical synthesis, which incorporates physical layout considerations into optimization processes. Continued development of the algorithm could yield valuable tools that compete with established industry leaders.
Peter0000
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
hi

I have an idea for new logic optimization algoritm, like "Quine–McCluskey algorithm" and the "Espresso heuristic logic minimizer", but it can handle multi-level representations and it can find the (theoretical) best circuit. It should work for 8 to 12 input bits. I was wondering if such an algoritm has useful applications and if it is worth the effort to make it. Can someone give his or her thoughts on it?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Nowadays, logic optimization is more than finding the theoretically best logical circuit. You need to consider the fanout, gate size, delay for each cells, power consumption, end-to-end overall delay...
But having a good algorithm is a must and if you have one, you have a great chance although I think 8 to 12 bit limit is too small(Imagine, one verilog module usually has hundreds of ports)
And the recent trend is more for physical synthesis..i.e. taking the physical locations into account upon the synthesis and optimization. Synopsys, Magma, and probably Cadence all are doing it..

I'd say keep working. If your tool is good enough, not necessary the best in the industry, someone may want to use it if the cost performance is right.
You might be able to beat Synopsys some day if you refine your idea,, who knows.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top